coexistence is a sin

i propose the thought that to coexist is in nature sin.

to attempt to exist in coexistence is a sin; din is defined as:



1. A transgression of a religious or moral law, especially when deliberate.
2. Theology
a. Deliberate disobedience to the known will of God.
b. A condition of estrangement from God resulting from such disobedience.
3. Something regarded as being shameful, deplorable, or utterly wrong.
intr.v. sinned, sin·ning, sins
1. To violate a religious or moral law.
2. To commit an offense or violation.


the act of coexistence is a sin against the being whom coexistence is acted upon. when one exists there is a necessary function of attempting to maintain focus on god when coexisting with others, this pressure leads to all the many forms of sins definition.


in math sine is basically expressions of coexistence with different modalities of physical expression;

Sine: Definition
The sine function can be defined in a number of ways:

Definition I: From a triangle



Given any angle q (0 £ q £ 90°), we can find the sine of that angle by constructing a right triangle with one vertex of angle q. The sine is equal to the length of the side opposite to q, divided by the length of the triangle's hypotenuse. In this way, we can find the sine of any q in the range 0 £ q £ 90°.

Definition II: From the unit circle



Draw a unit circle, in that a circle of radius 1, centered at the origin of a 2-dimensional coordinate system. Given an angle q, the sin(q) can be defined as the y-coordinate of the point on the circle that is located at an angle q from the origin. (According to standard convention, angles are measured counterclockwise from the positive horizontal axis.) In this way, we can find the sine of any real value of q (q Î Â).

Definition III: An algebraic approach

From defining a few general properties of the sine and cosine functions, we can algebraically derive the sine and cosine functions themselves.

Definition IV: Over the complex numbers

Given a complex number z = a + b i,
sin(z) = sin(a)cosh(b) + cos(a)sinh(b) i





the expression of another being from the imaginary from perspective of real being the object being sine'd or sinned upon is the act of coexistence and is a sin within theology upon said being as it fulfills all definitions of a sin when in action of coexistence.

co·ex·ist (kg-zst)
intr.v. co·ex·ist·ed, co·ex·ist·ing, co·ex·ists
1. To exist together, at the same time, or in the same place.
2. To live in peace with another or others despite differences, especially as a matter of policy: "recognize and accept, as every President in the nuclear age has, that this means coexisting with the Soviet Union"

So.....what? Live together in peace is a SIN?!

I'm afraid you've lost me.
Did you mean 'cohabiting'?

ok lets say a circle is a solid; if i exist within the circle that is solid am i not exerting force on what was a circle?even though you can label it coexisting am i not by theology's cannon committing a sin/sine upon the circle?

it is impossible to exist together, at the same time, or in the same place.
to obfuscate the original intent of the post with your comprehension of the thread and further words such as peace; has little to do with sin.
there is no policy that is edict or law that states you have the right to not make me what i am by virtue of you attempting to be within what is my existence, further from your perspective what are you really doing by trying; as my existence is different from my perspective or yours as a sine or sin tangent to my being.

if all within the habitat are the same organ within a body there is no coexistence but existence with a body functioning with organs.

reply to post by Ausar

Hi,
Are you talking about people living together when not married?

And, I don't understand the relevance of the math offered. Sorry, I'm getting old and mostly educated in the school of life.

the conspiracy in religion is religion; using what it learns from bodies it wants to be a part of to coexist.but they failed because theres just too many clues with the words and laws used.it associated itself with the means it assimilates bodies and considers itself the body it attempts to use for assimilation.this is part of the conspiracy.a sine can never become a circle and a sine can think itself a circle because of prolonged observation;dont look directly at the sun you go blind.but the body is different that the body sin attempts to know but attempts to use itself; sin: to be the body, and goes so far as to promulgate ideas of coexistence.

if they are not "bodies" but organs within a functioning body there is nothing wrong with "cohabitation". but sin can never love the body; and sine can never be the circle or triangle.so if the cohabitation is for the purpose of indifferentation attempting to be in/with/in peace with what is observed as a body different from "self-existence"; "they" are attempting coexistence and it is a path for/of sin: and coexistence itself is sin.

Reply to post by Ausar

Perhaps those "commandments" of exclusivity is nothing more than the addition of the various "churches" to support the institution and concemtrate their power? That, to quote a favorite show of mine:

Dr. Stephen Franklin: May God save us from false religion.
Sinclair: What makes a religion false? If any religion is right, then maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers just that you say them.

Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com


[edit on 14-2-2010 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]

Do you mean "all is one" and to think we are separate is a sin? Because there is only space for the one, and there will never be anything outside it? But that we make an illusionary life that we are outside it, and that is the sin?

Explanation: S&F!

Ultimately...There can ONLY BE ONE!

This is Spiritual Science with high level mathematics using Time+Space algorythyms used as an ALLEGORY for our relationships BOTH spiritually and physically with each other i.e. or sine / sin = Attitude!

Its also an issue of SCALE and Location of POV.

For example.... Observing the entire universal/GLOBAL scale from a TRANSCENDENT [i.e. Non Local to the Global state] POV results in seeing the WHOLE of Time+Space existence as a singularity and there is only YOU observing this. This is the POV of the SOURCE! Its a simple POV as it JUST IS! There is no Attitude and therfor NO sine / sin!

So now...let us come down a peg in the scale to a GLOBAL but IMMANENT POV. This results in an INTIMATE overview of the whole map from the POV of the MAP itself! This is the POV of the Godhead and is where all necessity can be fulfilled as you literally the ONE! There is Attitude but its all internal and not external and therefor it has no specific required angle
of attack and therefor no sine / sin!

OK lets go down another peg in scale to a LOCAL POV, which must be immanent by default of immersion within a greater GLOBAL scale!
This POV results in multiple relationships with all other localities.
These relationships are highly definable by their individual Attitudes towards / away from each other and those Attitudes can be wholy defined by there sine / sin angles between each of the Localities.

Personal Disclosure: There are more scales ect and I encourage anybody who understands what I have just posted and who wants some more info, to look carefully at my signature.

P.S. This thread TOTALLY made my day. It made ABSOLUTE sense to me!

edited [very late edit] to change The into This. Sigh

[edit on 14-2-2010 by OmegaLogos]

reply to post by rubyeyes

Thank you for speaking in plain language for us plebs.

May your way of communicating be contagious to this thread

Wow man, you are deep. I don't know much about math, but I looked up "Sine". I think you are right. Hence all these churches with different dogmas and limiting concepts are a sin against nature. They are trying to be a "reality" outside of the ONE. And our bodies, believe our pain to be real and struggling mentally, its a sin. That how we are all sinful, because we are only seeing once piece of the puzzle, and accepting it as whole and individual when its not. If I understand you correctly. True recollection of oneness will break the bonds of all suffering.

[edit on 14-2-2010 by rubyeyes]

In other words...

Be what you is
and not what you are not.

Folks welcome this
as the happiest lot!

Peace

reply to post by Ausar


Your principal point of cotention is that 'co-existance is a sin' but went off tangent when you use mathematics as a branch of science to support your hypothesis.

Co-existance exists in ALL forms of science and nature which give us sustenance. Can hydrogen exists alone and give us water necessary to replenish our thirst, amongst its many uses in our body? Nope.

Can matter exists without protons and electrons? Nope.

I guess you will have to go back to your drawing board, and study carefully all academic issues prior to proclaiming and believing that your hypothesis is true or even have any philosphical value.

As a whole, co-existance is necessary and vital if we are to survive as a civilised society and not barbaric beasts of the wild jungles where there is but one law that only leads to extermination.

And that is the true purpose in evolution of our sciences and philosophies - progress of mankind and overcoming any shortcommings, even religious dogma, inorder to leap forward, if not for our sake, at least for the next generations' sake.

I apologise if i, a mere nobody, had offended.



[edit on 14-2-2010 by SeekerofTruth101]

It took me a while.

It's sounds like this.


Stop being influenced by emotion and understand your nothing more like a single cell in a body.
Only then you can understand you're the body.

Am I right ?

Sin is not the same as original sin.

That statement in itself describes and explains everything there is needed to be known about sin. There is, however, a much deeper and wider application to how it all applies to our world and the way we live.

Origin sin is the event that happens when virgin space changes. The default direction of original sin is backwards to the ordinary events of history. The status quo of history understands these events as virgin first and original sin second.

Space that is thought to be empty and made of use for life needs to be considered virgin. Any space that is not known is automatically declared as original sin. All life that is discovered in such space is consider to live in original sin. When all lives within original sin are discovered not to be of sin then the space is considered virgin.

I hope this helps.