PROOF that Building 7 was demolished with explosives!!!

reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1


I watched that Mythbusters too. I dont know how you think it was cut through like butter. I didnt see the car cleaved in two halfs. No I saw a burned car, with a few holes melted through the roof that went into the interior and burned the inside. But no, I did not see a car cut in two. Nope nope nope!

Fireproofing has a time rating. Most are for two-three hours of exposure. How long was the WTC7 burning? 6-7 hours? Yeah, forgot that didnt you?

There were plenty of objects that can go "boom" when you just had two 110 story buildings which each have one acre of floor space (220 acres) collapsing and burning right on top of hundreds of vehicals, firetrucks, police cars, trucks, etc etc etc. Oh and another 47 story building burning from top to bottom for 7 hours. OH! And TWO airliners burning as well! Gee what wouldnt go boom in THAT scenario?

Ah now the Reichtag burning is similar to 9/11? Oh sure, I mean how complicated must it be to set fire to a building in the middle of the night right?
Yeah thats much more complicated than rigging up with explosives and magic paint-on thermite, two 110 story OCCUPIED highrises, in the middle of a bustling metro area, a 47 story building that is also occupied, setting up four airliners with "whatever" to attack the buildings with, faking hundreds, if not, thousands of eyewitnesses and media outlet reports, hiding all evidence of tampering with blackboxes, planting aircraft parts, etc etc etc. And having first responders also being in on it, and demo experts, and firefighters, and police, and structural engineers ON SITE who visually saw the conditions of the buildings and knew they were bad.

Unless you can somehow show us how only a hand full of men managed to pull this all off, with the "drones" working for them without asking questions. Come now, I know people are not braindead drones and would speak up if something fishy was up.

And by the way, thats GenRadek, not GlenRadek. Be a little careful next time.

reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1



1. There is a video online of firefighters walking away from WTC 7 saying "that building is going to come down" BOOM, BOOM. "It's coming down soon."

-Is there a video where you can hear explosions before the towers collapse?



3. Thermite would cut through steel.

- If it cuts through steel why did such a large amount of thermite have such a hard time and end up not cutting an aluminum car in half??

reply to post by iamcpc1


Now take a look at this one from the patriots 9/11 site:

Major Glenn MacDonald, U.S. Army Reserve (ret) – Former U.S. Army combat correspondent in Vietnam, 1966 - 1969. Former ABC and UPI News Correspondent. Former Military Historian, U.S. Army War College.
"One of the things that jumped out at me when I looked at the footage of the video of Flight 175 as it went into the World Trade Center is it appeared to me that there was something on the underfuselage of that aircraft that did not belong there, at least not with a commercial airliner.

Now, I'll tell you where I have seen attachments that look like that -- on military aircraft. So the question we have to answer now is, 'Was that the commercial airliner that hit the World Trade Center or possibly was it an aircraft that looked very similar but was a military-type airplane?' ..." at 10:05 of the video

"Well, the pod could have been a number of things. It could have been even a missile attached. It could have been some kind of explosive attached. But whatever it was, it didn't belong there in a commercial flight ... " at 13:59 of the video

An experience person, yes, impressive military background, but whats he arguing for? Pods on the plane? You see what I mean with "professionals"?

edit, delete double post!

[edit on 5/14/2010 by GenRadek]

reply to post by GenRadek


www.youtube.com...

shows a better quality. They put over 1000 pounds of thermite in and on the car and used bricks to ensure that it would cut downward into the car.

"as far as we know nobody's used this much before"

"it looks like the thermite strip hasn't quite cleaved the roof"

Why was over 1000 pounds of thermite unable to cut through the aluminum roof of a car?

Aluminum melts at a lower temperature than steel. Wouldn't it be much easier for thermite "slice through like butter".

I notice how they had to fast forward though through the replay of the burning. To show how long it took.

reply to post by iamcpc1


How does this prove your point? Thermite burns at hotter degrees than fire, yet it doesn't burn through a car the way you want it to? How do you expect fire to weaken steel?

It can't.

reply to post by iamcpc1


Thermite can reach degrees even higher than 2800 degrees F. This line of thinking makes no sense.

reply to post by iamcpc1


Is one video better than another?

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by iamcpc1


www.youtube.com...

reply to post by GenRadek


Your points don't need to be refuted. Reading them is enough.

reply to post by Alfie1


Are you being serious? Type dancing israelis into google.

whatreallyhappened.com...
whatreallyhappened.com...
abcnews.go.com...
www.fpp.co.uk...
whatreallyhappened.com...

Like I said about Flight 93, I don't know.

Is there even more to be discussed?

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
reply to post by iamcpc1

 

How does this prove your point? Thermite burns at hotter degrees than fire, yet it doesn't burn through a car the way you want it to? How do you expect fire to weaken steel?

It can't.

It can and does.

As you are unaware of something called metallurgy, you might want to go to Google U and learn about some part of it. Steel is rated for strength but it is derated when it gets hot. That means that when it is hot [or "at hotter degrees," as you say], it is not as strong as when it is colder. That is how everyone that understands the topic, even a little, expects fire to weaken steel.

This is not a theory about steel, this is the result of measurements.

reply to post by pteridine


You don't understand my point.

My decision to unblock you was unwise.

reply to post by pteridine


www.thefreedictionary.com...

reply to post by iamcpc1


You know what you proved? You proved that no one should be buying any bumb thermite mixed by the Mythbuster brothers. they obviously don't have the correct formula.

reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1


You should learn to clarify. Restate your point if you didn't mean that fire can't weaken steel.

Originally posted by impressme

Explain how much nano thermite was not disguised as red paint and was burned in the the demolition. Also, show evidence proving the amount of unburned nano Thermite that remained in the dust.

It probably was 1/4 th. teaspoon and a portable oxigen tank!!!


PS. Bought at the local WalMart of course.

reply to post by iamcpc1


I was surprised too and a little disappointed. I wanted to see that car cleaved in half, just like how the TM was raving about how great thermite is and how it can cut through steel columns, no problem. It can even cut horizontally! But reality strikes again! This thermite didnt even cut the suv in half. It just burned holes, sort of, and poured through and ignited the interior. I mean it didnt even stick around long enough to just cut through.

reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1


Ah yes, well done on that response, showed so much ......... well I dont know what that showed, other than your incredulity. I see that personal incredulity trumps facts and truth eh?

Whats the matter Aquarian? Dont want to refute them, or CANT refute them, so you have to resort to such childish tactics.

Now as for the thermite, yes it can burn as high as 2800F. Did you know it can even burn hotter at temps of 4000F? Thats thermate. But of course, as we saw, Mythbusters couldnt even cut a car in half with 1000lbs of it. 1000lbs coldnt do it, and that was much, much much thinner than the columns, but wait wait wait! How can thermite cut horizontally through a column? Isnt it just going to pour right off the columns, not even giving enough time to heat the column to plasticity? Hell I doubt it would even warm it beyond a few degrees before it all pours off. So how did they manage to keep in on the columns?