posted on Feb, 4 2010 @ 06:19 AM
Judas of Kerioth is a hard character to write about. The only people who much care about him are Christians, and unsurprisingly, they think he's a
bad guy.
Although they can be selective about that. A lot of Christians over time have managed to hold a very constructive attitude about Longinus, the soldier
who, according to tradition, stabbed Jesus. Supposedly, Longinus repented, achieved a gruesome martyrdom, and was sainted.
I suppose, then, what is damnable about Judas is not that he grassed on Jesus, but that he didn't repent afterwards. Although Matthew kills
Judas off before Jesus (oddly, however, in what obviously is, if it were true, an overt display of repentance), Peter in Acts suggests an
unrepentant death, apparently sometime after the Resurrection.
I also wonder if Judas is not the last Christian scapegoat. At least eleven, and possibly all twelve (depending on who the Beloved Disciple in
John actually was), of The Twelve were missing in action on Good Friday. That would be the same crew that couldn't stay awake the night
before. Clearly, then, loyalty was thin on the ground.
Of those who cut and ran, everybody except Judas repented. Personally, I have been around the track a few times in organizations. Whoever misses a Big
Meeting often gets blamed for a lot of things, and ends up being assigned the dirty jobs. I can't help but wonder if something like that happened
here, too.
The logic of the story is that Longinus did good, whatever his intention. The logic of the story is also that Judas did good, regardless of his
intention. Finally, the logic of the story is that if Judas had sought forgiveness from the risen Jesus, then forgiveness he would have had.
[edit on 4-2-2010 by eight bits]