It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by impressme
And your NIST simply swallowed the foolishness of the Bush administration instructions and lies, in putting together, their laughable pseudo science that doesn’t stand up to high school sciences.
Richard Gage is a man you fear, you fear the very truth that sciences can support and will support.
You're lying through your teeth and we both know it.
NIST didn't mention even ONCE any of the politics or methodology of the terrorist attacks.
They discussed entirely the mechanical and physical effects of the plane impacts on the buildings.
The planes could have been empty drones under remote control from UFOs and the report would have still been accurate.
The problem YOU have with NIST is that it contradicts the particular conspiracy you yourself want to believe...which isn't surprising, seeing that you conspriacy people are all but getting into fistfights over what this "secret conspiracy" even is.
The moment Gage compared the collapsing WTC towers with a falling box, I recognized this is a guy who didn't know jack s**t what he was talking about. Where the [censored] is the science backing THAT up?
Admit it, Impressme, you'd believe that Bush was conspiring to crash the moon into the Earth if these damned fool conspriacy web sites told you that.