It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnny2127
Originally posted by koolerthanjesus
I think most of us can agree this is a bad decision. But shouldn't we be looking to where to go from here? Any ideas out there? All this vitriol is counter productive. Isn't it? Or do we just vent rage and go on with business as usual.
Agreed. The only two places to go are:
1) Limiting the influence of corporations and unions through constitutional means that do not suppress freedom of speech.
2) A constitutional amendment.
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
reply to post by ziggystrange
What will any of that accomplish? We're just peasants to these people and we have no money or power to entice or convince them. I honestly think it's time to start offing politicians and put the fear of god back into them. There's a reason we have a second amendment. We need to start using it before they take that away too.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
Conservatives should be happy with this ruling. We are the group in the country that does not believe the constitution is a living document.
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
reply to post by ziggystrange
I
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
reply to post by ziggystrange
...So you have no concept of American history, the creation and philosophy behind the bill of rights and specifically the 2nd, or the principals set in place by our founding fathers.
Well have fun knocking on politician doors holding a petition, that should get you real far in the modern world.
[edit on 22-1-2010 by CuriousSkeptic]
Originally posted by Carseller4
Leave it to Conservative Justices to protect free speech and defend the Constitution!
Bravo Conservative Justices!
Originally posted by jeffkingman
I hope you guys all realize this entire thing was done because a group of ameteur film makers where forbidden to air a documentary on hillary clinton because it felt too much like an ad campaign.
I guess freedom of speech doesn't matter to you guys?
Originally posted by jeffkingman
I know the problem, I know it sucks, but you can't start taking rights away just because some people can abuse it.
It really was a no-lose solution for the supreme court.
Either they rule against the film makers, and the whole thing turns into a big stink about them restricting our rights, or we go into where we're at now.
It's not the end of the word. Really.