$10,000 reward for any person who can find any proof that H1N1 vaccines are both safe and effective

I've just recieved the following message in my inbox from Natural News whereby they are offering $10,000 for any person who can find any proof that H1N1 vaccines are both safe and effective

Surely there exists at least one skeptic who can back up their claims, right? 10k is a nice sum of money.

Source: www.naturalnews.com...

Excerpt from source outlining the criteria:

The $10,000 reward will be issued to anyone who can produce scientific evidence meeting the following criteria:

• A scientific paper, published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, describing the results of a minimum of two Phase III trials structured as randomized, placebo-controlled scientific clinical trials of an FDA-approved H1N1 vaccine currently in distribution, carried out on a minimum of 1,000 people (for statistical significance) for a duration of at least 90 days. The inclusion criteria for both clinical trials must be properly randomized so that the participants are representative of the entire U.S. population and not merely a desired sub-group selected to skew the research outcome. Inclusion criteria must be provided to NaturalNews for verification. • At the same time, the vaccine must be scientifically demonstrated to be effective at reducing H1N1 swine flu infections. Scientifically speaking, it must be demonstrated to reduce the death rate from H1N1 infections by a minimum of 50 percent (relative numbers, not absolute, since so few die from H1N1 in the first place). In other words, if 100,000 people get infected with H1N1 and 100 might normally die, the study must show that fewer than 50 vaccinated people die. This would equate to a 50 percent reduction in mortality from swine flu. If the vaccine is less than 50 percent effective, then it doesn't really offer much benefit for such a mild flu with extremely low fatality rates.

• Because vaccine promoters describe the vaccine as "safe enough for children and expectant mothers" and because vaccine promoters insist that there are absolutely no risks of long-term side effects, the study must demonstrate that the vaccine causes no statistically significant increase in side effects of any kind for a minimum of one year following the vaccine injection. You might think this is impossible to produce since the vaccine hasn't even existed for one year and couldn't have possibly been tested to see whether it produces neurological side effects in the one-year timeframe. That is exactly my point.

• Finally, due to widespread corruption and dishonesty in clinical trials that are funded by drug companies, these clinical trials must not be funded in whole or in part with drug company money. Funding for the studies must come from truly independent sources such as a government institution or a university with no financial ties to the vaccine manufacturer.

[edit on 21-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

i won't be winning that prize.

I never got vaccinated, for either strain of flu.
Can't remember the last time i was sick....



flu shots are for suckers.

ha! good luck with that reward. it will be sitting around for a loooong time.

Even though we didn't have a worldwide outbreak, I believe the powers that be will start saying it is because enough people took the vaccine th is season to prevent an outbreak. They may even use that propaganda to make the vaccine mandatory. It ain't over till the fat lady sings.

I am so glad I am not having chidren in the time period. Did you know autism is now diagnosed in 1 of 70 births? It used to be 1 in 2000. But you have to vaccinate your kids to send them to school.

20,000 per day (estimate) are dying in Haiti of preventable death because the supplies to save them are being held up at airports. There has got to be a conspiracy behind that.

Cool Vid here

Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
i won't be winning that prize.

I never got vaccinated, for either strain of flu.
Can't remember the last time i was sick....



flu shots are for suckers.

Agreed. Did you not get vaccines as a child?

reply to post by SuperSlovak


Where are all the skeptics now, eh? Oh wait, I forgot. They're only good at disproving rather than proving a theory.

[edit on 21-1-2010 by rexusdiablos]

10k is just a drop in the bucket, its insulting really...
You would need at least 10k in studies to "prove" anything and I'm not a fan anyways, of any miracle syrums.

I think many have said this, its a lot like those that use eye drops too offten=daily, habititually, after time the glands that tmake the natural moister drys up, do to not being needed, an addaptaion at best, don't want to dare to say the evlovs word.

This has been proven in antibiotics, and many chemicals personally injested that the body makes on its own, if you injest it, for any real legth of time, the body sees no reason or need to keep making it, you in short, turn that mechanism off.

Not to mention, multiple generations of these innoculated ppl have/are going on the 3rd-4th generation of offspring that have relied on un-natural, immune system ...tests...at best, not definatively proven either way to benefit are harm at this point, but I just keep looking at the results of any/all the past times we messed with ole Ms. Mother Nature, and I'm affraid we are due to get a punishment!

reply to post by rexusdiablos


I got my normal childhood vaccinations, but I have never in my life gotten a flu shot, and I almost never get sick. I've seen many people get the flu shot and then get sick the next day.

My GF, never got any of her shots as a kid....she's fine.