"My friends and I photographed an Angel"

reply to post by rdz24


Sceptics are just sceptical of people making claims without evidence. A photo of anything isn't evidence of the subject, as photos can be manipulated too easily. It's just an anecdote. It might be fun, it might inspire others to actually perform research, but it's not research or evidence in its own right.

Everyone should be sceptical of everything, otherwise we'll never learn. Every human discovery is the result of someone being sceptical.

reply to post by davesidious


Very good point and I agree, but my point was to make everyone realize that our minds can play tricks on and to be careful on our "evidence" .

[edit on 17-12-2009 by rdz24]

reply to post by rdz24


Aah - I totally agree Our minds, and by extension our eyes, are the worst instruments to measure with. If people realised that, the ATS Paranormal Studies board would be filled with actual paranormal study, instead of the "ZOMG I saw a DEMON!" rubbish.

Does any else have a picture of "Evidence" that they would like to share?
We need to compare and contrast items for discussion.

i agree with you that this looks like an angel but to me it looks different than how u displayed it in your outline

Uh.. if you have to make a red outline, then it isn't obviously anything.

If you didn't have to make an outline, then you would be on to something.

You can't just draw a picture of an angel, and say you got it on camera, how stupid is that?