Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails

Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails

news.yahoo.com

AP -- House Republicans pointed to controversial e-mails leaked from climate scientists and said it was evidence of corruption. Top administration scientists looking at the same thing found no such sign, saying it doesn't change the fact that the world is warming.

The e-mails from a British university's climate center were obtained by computer hackers and posted online about two weeks ago. Climate change skeptics contend the messages reveal that researchers manipulated data and stifled dissent.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Gee, what a surprise -- top administration scientists found no signs of corruption. What a fraud. How many other issues are we being lied to about? 9/11? Fluoride? GMO foods? BPA in plastics? Chemtrails? I'm sick of being deceived and poisoned from every direction.



news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Dude don't sweat it, the whole so called Climategate turned out to be a hoax


ClimateGate: The 7 Biggest Lies About The Supposed "Global Warming Hoax"



[edit on 2-12-2009 by December_Rain]

reply to post by December_Rain


Thanks, I am sure everyone here will jump right over and check out that scientific paper from the Huff.

Excuse me, the Huff isn't peer reviewed? Well neither were the Global Warming Hoax papers.

Nuff said to you.

I love it, Huff post prints a story rehashing the same talking points from when the story broke and Climategate is a "hoax".

Anyway on with the OP, the "science" advisors are nothing more than gov. lackyies I wouldn't expect anything from them. What the gov needs to do is calling in some Computer Scientist to dissect the code, that is where all the proof lies. Not to mention it gives context to the e-mails. Just wait by this time next year, AGW will be proven as a religion.

reply to post by December_Rain

The verdict on global warming is in -- it's caused by humans and it is happening and nothing in the emails remotely challenges that.

Whew, glad she quickly cleared that up! The verdict is in, just like 9/11.

Thanks, I feel better now.

From the source:

"Among the messages that Sensenbrenner read was one from Jones, the East Anglia scientist, in which he wrote about a "trick of adding in the real temps" in an exchange about long-term climate trends. Holdren responded that the word "trick" did not mean manipulation of data, but about a "clever way" to tackle a problem."

Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket!!

Freakin' losers are worried about losing all the money they stand to reap if Cap and Trade is approved.

reply to post by GoldenFleece


Well one thing that always stays true about "Progressives" is that they never let truth get in the way of their goal of total government control over everyones lives. It is just part of their anal retentive, control freak nature.