It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A few weeks ago, hackers broke into the emails of one of the Climate Research Unit of The University of East Anglia, and climate skeptics have been having a field day making mountains out of molehills about what the emails contain. The verdict on global warming is in -- it's caused by humans and it is happening and nothing in the emails remotely challenges that. However, with the internet abuzz about what has been labeled "ClimateGate," we thought we should set the record straight about the rumors, lies and insinuations about what the emails actually contain -- and what they "prove" about
Originally posted by mrsoul2009
The money involved in proving that man-made climate change is false is far greater than any money to be made through CO2 containment.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
These are the same old dried up talking points that have been said since this story broke.
There is absolutely nothing that the Huff Post said that even remotely clears the scientist.
The Huff Post says, in a nutshell, "The e-mails were taken out of context". I call BS. They even threw a claim in there about how one e-mail was "edited", well that is nice to know I wonder where they got that information from, seeing how nobody is denying the e-mails are altered or fake.
The fact is the code and data back up the e-mails and the code proves they have manipulated data.
Also the AGW alarmist crowd has way more to gain, what more is there to gain than trillions of dollars for "solutions" to a non-existent problem. AGW is now an official religion they even have people that will defend it even when all the proof says otherwise.
Also just for kickers, CO2 lags Temperature, th
at disproves the current hypothesis of AGW.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
nobody is denying the e-mails are altered or fake.
Originally posted by Schlotzkins
Originally posted by mrsoul2009
The money involved in proving that man-made climate change is false is far greater than any money to be made through CO2 containment.
Verrrrry interesting take. Seeing as Al Gore has increased his net worth to over $100 million by frightening the world. I believe he was worth around a mil when he left office to begin his new career as savior.
Oh, and who is it that is proposing global taxation to resolve this "crisis"? For some reason I'm thinking it is not the "right-wing" climate change deniers.
Originally posted by mrsoul2009
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife
I see - you know its good for the mind to try and read through the spin of the media - which is again in full swing here with "Climategate" - guess you'd rather reference Alex Jones...excuse me I didn't realize the level of erudition on this site..lol.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
I'm glad I have you on ignore.
I personally don't care for Alex Jones so I don't read or listen to what he has to say. I read the e-mails for myself and also looked at the code for myself. I also don't need an article which labels people "deniers" because people want hard facts about the "science" that the "scientist" refuse to give until this whole scandal came to light. Then for these same "scientist" to say, "We threw away the raw data, all we have is the 'value-added' data." Which means independent scientist can't verify their work.
I also know how the Scientific Method works, and these Climate "scientist" haven't been following the scientific method. So yes I can see through the Media Bias, and I can also see through the members of the Church of Climatology that rely on what their priests tell them to think, that result to false assumptions and insults, because they don't have a clue and therefore can't debate the subject intelligently.
Originally posted by mrsoul2009
Seems to me like the real conspiracy here is being pushed by the right-wing operatives who are looking for a way to discredit climate change.
Let's face it, the ramifications for climate change on the PTB are huge - and all financial. The money involved in proving that man-made climate change is false is far greater than any money to be made through CO2 containment.
www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)