Iran authorizes 10 new uranium plants

From CNN

www.cnn.com...

Can you say"Pre-Emptive Strike"???

I wonder how the world will handle this???

Already a thread going here www.abovetopsecret.com...

In theory.......

The UN security council should take it poorly.

Even China and Russia signed complaint document.

Now, will Russia/China do anything but sign unbinding document, very doubtful.

Add to that the on again/off again sa-300 missile system sale to Iran.

I seriously doubt Israel will allow 10 new bomb making plants.

Iran really, really wants to be bombed.

I believe soon, they will get their wish.

Originally posted by mrmonsoon
In theory.......

The UN security council should take it poorly.

Even China and Russia signed complaint document.

Now, will Russia/China do anything but sign unbinding document, very doubtful.

Add to that the on again/off again sa-300 missile system sale to Iran.

I seriously doubt Israel will allow 10 new bomb making plants.

Iran really, really wants to be bombed.

I believe soon, they will get their wish.

LOL man how many times do i have to say this IT AINT GOING TO HAPPEN THIS YEAR noone can be bothered to send airplanes into iran with international gift giving day coing up and noone wants a 3rd world war before 2010 THAT's when doomsday starts j/k although knowing isreal they did bomb palestine in december so it MIGHT happen but doubtful considering how far they would have to fly and those iraqi's love to shoot at planes.

If they want more uranium, maybe we should send them some plutonium, air delivery, free of charge.

Sorry just couldn't help it

Originally posted by buddhasystem
If they want more uranium, maybe we should send them some plutonium, air delivery, free of charge.

Sorry just couldn't help it

So,....what you want us to nuke iran? lol go ahead see isreal crumple into a pile of dust there is NO way the us could deliver a nuke that JUST fits inside irans boarders without radiation leaking out and pissing people off.

reply to post by rationaluser


What about the US's MOAB's-Mother of All Bombs.

These are "supposed" to have the power of a small nuclear device, while being conventional.

Much of Iran's nuclear bomb making set-ups are under ground.

The new larger ground penetrating bombs would just about do the job.

Now, this is all just how it can be done-not if it should be done.

I ask everyone, if Iran's nuke sites could be destroyed with conventional weapons only, would that make it any more acceptable to the rest of the world???

Rationaluser, thanks for my laugh of the day-I see the humor.