posted on Oct, 27 2009 @ 01:18 PM
Socialism isn't bad. Socialism simply means that workers own and control the means of production, thus eliminating the exploitative system of
wage slavery.
What you're referring to is "State Socialism", a left wing ideology that shares traits with statist nationalism, i.e. fascism. State Socialism and
Socialism only became confused when Marx used the term
socialism to describe
state socialism as the intermediary transitional phase
between capitalism and communism. The need for state socialism is the flaw in Marx's system, and consequently, the Communist Revolution has never
gotten past the State Socialism stage due to human greed, causing it to collapse into statist nationalism and show more in common with right wing
authoritarian ideals. Communism, the final stage, isn't the state controlled system that Stalin, Mao, etc have ruled over, but the lack of the state
and thus the distribution of industry and goods equally across the population. Marx believed that in state socialism, or "the dictatorship of the
Proletariat" as he called it, the state would dissolve away. Greed simply makes this impossible, which is why the theories and ideas of leftist
anarchists such as Bakunin or the original socialists need to be presented to people at large, not the idea that communism = socialism, gulags,
genocide, and starvation.