Here is the first of many
"SYNCHRONISTIC DIGITS between DATES of : ..." threads I'll be making showing the span of days between similar
events being hauntingly pattern-like .....in that they have repeating digits in the number of days between them, .. so what? well i'd say so what
also.. but for so many similar type events to be tied together by repeating digit time spans.. has me more than curious as to why...
this one considers that the specific dates of major events concerning Lunar Exploration are planned to be in specific numerological relation to one
another in regards to the number of days between them.
lets start.
here are the dates we'll be using...
09/14/59 russian luna 2 impact
10/07/59 luna 3 1st photos dark side
02/03/66 luna 9 1st photos by landed probe
12/24/68 armstrong apollo 1st lunar orbit by human
07/20/69 1st human on moon
03/10/1973 pink floyd dark side moon (ref: "floyd")
09/03/06 SMART1 impact plume
11/14/08 indian moon lander impact
06/10/09 selene japan impact
10/09/09 Lcross impact
here are some oddly unique day spans... quite unusual to happen to such related events...
From and including: Sunday, September 3, 2006 smart1 impact
To and including: Friday, October 9, 2009 lcross impact
It is 1133 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
Or 3 years, 1 month, 1 week
From and including: Friday, November 14, 2008 indian moon lander
To and including: Friday, October 9, 2009 lcross impact
It is 330 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
From and including: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 selene impact
To and including: Friday, October 9, 2009 lcross impact
It is 122 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
Or 4 months
From and including: Sunday, September 3, 2006 smart1 impact
To, but not including : Wednesday, June 10, 2009 selene impact
It is 1011 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
From and including: Monday, September 14, 1959 luna 2 impact
To, but not including : Friday, October 9, 2009 lcross impact
It is 18,288 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
and some not so obvious repeating digit spans.. (ie: "sandwiched numbers" 747- 616 etc)
From and including: Wednesday, October 7, 1959 luna 3 dark side photos
To, but not including : Sunday, July 20, 1969 armstrong
It is 3575 days from the start date to the end date, including the end date
From and including: Monday, September 14, 1959 luna 2 impact
To and including: Sunday, September 3, 2006 smart1 impact
It is 17,157 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
From and including: Monday, September 14, 1959 luna 2 impact
To and including: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 selene impact
It is 18,168 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
note the 17
157 then the 18
168
From and including: Monday, September 14, 1959 luna 2 impact
To, but not including : Friday, November 14, 2008 indian moon lander
It is 17,959 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
and just for fun i threw in pink floyd's "dark side of the moon" release date..
From and including: Wednesday, October 7, 1959 luna 3 dark side photos
To, but not including : Saturday, March 10, 1973 floyd
* 700 weeks (rounded down)
From and including: Sunday, July 20, 1969 armstrong
To, but not including : Saturday, March 10, 1973 floyd
It is 1330 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
From and including: Saturday, March 10, 1973 floyd
To and including: Friday, October 9, 2009 lcross impact
It is 13,363 days from the start date to the end date, end date included
* 1909 weeks
reference links -
en.wikipedia.org..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
It's fun to explore this... it's more than uncanny ...
watch the video "chronoclysm" in my sig for some more... i'll be making few more threads on this too...
so if the Japanese, Indian, American and European top ranking space explorers see these coincidences.. would they gasp and feign a smirkishly "how
odd" (chuckle chuckle) remark
or would they say:
"why yes we're completely networked and do this on purpose.. if we're to be accurate technically, then we're going to be as accurate and
orderly as possible chronologically as well...and we place our historic events in time specifically and precisely in relation to other events of
similarity..
.......just as you would do so in orderly placement of the components of a building's framework intelligently distanced from one another... or as the
circuitry of a chip, distanced from one another for specific reason and efficiency.....
AS so we do in placing historic events in the architecture of history.
on all fronts."
-