WARNING! A treaty creating a One World Government is going to be signed in December !

After reading up a little more I can see the severity of this situation. The president of the United States is basically signing away the rights of his own people. How can this be legal I asked myself. It came down to this...with all the recent(2-5 years) of environmental doom-sayers antics it has basically given governments the immunity to do whatever they want as long as they do it under the guise of Environmental Conservation...This Is Messed Up!!!

LifENcircleS

reply to post by LifENcircleS


Something else, ain't it?

Imagine that 90% of the people involved here have no idea what the issue is.

Nay, most people actually welcome this.

The New World Order and One World Government are a good thing for everyone.

U.S. sovereignty doesn't matter. We live in a new world, and it's better if everything in the world was done in a fair and concise manner rather than illegal wars and ponzi schemes by America.

The New World Order will take humanity farther than ever, and for people who think NWO is a bad thing, you are mistaken.

It's something that NEEDS TO BE DONE.
whatever the harsh rules/laws are...a WORLD GOVERNMENT needs to happen.
Its only because of our division in countries wars still remain.

Copied from another board:


After I read the stunning article located here:

www.infowars.com...

I wasn’t sure what to think. I read the Treaty linked in there, and it seemed so innocuous that I decided to speak with someone who was there, since I was not, to get a better grip on the information given by the speaker, and the implications of the reported Treaty to be signed in December. I confirmed that the presentation did indeed take place, and spoke with a man, a citizen (retired from Air Force) who had attended the meeting. His name is Paul Pekarek from St Paul, Minnesota. I also spoke with his wife Melissa. Paul is retired from the Military after serving 20 years in the United States Air Force.

The presentation was held at the Minnesota Free Market Institute on 10/14/09. The speaker was Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

I confirmed the details as reported in the article linked at the top of this page through Paul, who was in attendance. I asked him for his recollections of the presentation, the general feel of the audience, and what he learned from the presentation.

Paul learned of the upcoming presentation from his father, Petroleum Geolostist. He was interested in hearing what Lord Monckton had to say regarding Climate Change and Global Warming. Mr. Pekarek was very well versed in climate change and global warming.

Mr Pekarek said that about 700 people were in attendance but that he didn’t see any Press there.

Before I called Mr. Pekarek, I read through the document the article refers to: “A shared vision for long-term cooperative action“. You are encouraged to download this and read it.

Mr. Pekarek informed me there will be video audio of the presentation available this evening online on the Minnesota Free Market Institute website.

Part of the article that stunned me is this quote: “I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity.” I asked Mr. Pekarek about this and he stated that there were three purposes given and he remembered the first two were World Government (US Sovereignty lost) and Global Wealth Redistribution.

I asked Mr. Pekarek how it was explained that this Treaty (also known as a Convention) would take away our US Sovereignty. He said that the Treaty itself doesn’t do it, but that Article 6 of our Constitution states that: “all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;”

Mr. Lord Monckton states that this Treaty (again, Conventions are Treaties) would give US Sovereignty to the UN.

I asked Mr. Pekarek what other negative impacts the Treaty might have on the United States. He stated that we would have a World Government entity, which would supersede our government, that this Treaty amounts to Forced Worldwide Wealth Redistribution. All countries are expected to sign the Treaty.

I asked him why the Kyoto Protocol was mentioned. He explained that is also Wealth Redistribution.

Mr. Pekarek stated that a video “Climate Chains” was just posted FMI’s website prior to our interview.

Mr. Pekarek said there were a number of references to Obama’s agenda, but most attention was given to Al Gore’s theories, and the whole evening’s focus on global warming, and the lies perpetrated by the socialist agenda.

For example, Mr. Pekarek stated that last year, Al Gore was invited by the Majority party, to testify to Congress about Global Warming. The Minority party invited Lord Monckton to speak. He was about to get on his plane when he was informed that he was disinvited by the Majority party. Therefore, Al Gore got to speak alone, uncontested and unchallenged. This was the first time this ever happened in Congress. Al Gore has yet to respond to Lor

After you watch the Lord Monckton video, watch President Obama on this topic. Really chilling.

He's addressing the U.N. in Sept. I actually watched this speech live and was wondering why he was making SUCH a big deal about addressing global warming NOW.

Listen to him again, now, after watching and reading Lord Monckton and looking at the treaty, I see what Obama's said in a whole different light. His talk about "sharing resources with the world" and "leading the fight" takes on a whole different meaning. Listen to this and you'll see --he really does intend to hand the U.S. over to the U.N. on a silver platter under the guise of "Global Warming & Climate Change."

Got to hand it to Obama. He actually tells us what he's going to do. We just don't comprehend it until its hit us in the face.

www.youtube.com...

Global warming (real or not) is being used to destroy our country and create the "one world government." We need to WAKE UP NOW.

Originally posted by JayinAR
The Nobel Prize being awarded to Obama was a "thanks" if you will, from the elite who are satisfied that he is going to dissolve American Soveriegnty.

Thank you for saying that. I was trying to explain this same theory to my friend last night. But - she wasn't having it. It's a perfect plan - and I'm sad to say it appears to be going over the heads of many a folk.

Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by LifENcircleS

 

Something else, ain't it?

Imagine that 90% of the people involved here have no idea what the issue is.

Nay, most people actually welcome this.

Yes, and our children have been brainwashed into believing that global warming is going to "destroy" the world and that the United States is to blame by their liberal (communist) teachers. They believe America should be dissolved so we can be citizens of the world. Yup, our kids are primed and ready for the takeover.

And make no mistake, we are being taken over.

its definately 100% (at least in this draft) true heres the link to the draft version. . . it took forever to find btw and im not done reading it yet

wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com...

this is what ive found so far Page 18-19

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

(b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fundincluding five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, toaddress loss and damage from climate change impacts, including insurance,rehabilitation and compensatory components, (c) a Technology window; (d) a Mitigationwindow; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forestincentives relating to REDD actions.(c) The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes foradaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; (c) a short-term technologyaction plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body onadaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reportingand verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting andverification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer oftechnical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. Thesecretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre forinformation exchange.

Flag this for it needs front page attention. . . maybe someone more fluent in legal speak can analyze



[edit on 16-10-2009 by constantwonder]

Originally posted by constantwonder
its definately 100% (at least in this draft) true heres the link to the draft version. . . it took forever to find btw and im not done reading it yet

wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com...

this is what ive found so far Page 18-19

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

(b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fundincluding five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, toaddress loss and damage from climate change impacts, including insurance,rehabilitation and compensatory components, (c) a Technology window; (d) a Mitigationwindow; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forestincentives relating to REDD actions.(c) The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes foradaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; (c) a short-term technologyaction plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body onadaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reportingand verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting andverification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer oftechnical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. Thesecretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre forinformation exchange.

[edit on 16-10-2009 by constantwonder]

Glad you found it. Now, check out Obama's talk to the U.N. in light of what you've just posted. Here's the link:

www.youtube.com...

page 122

17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.

so were all gonna pay. . . well namely AMERICA is gonna pay

Originally posted by constantwonder
its definately 100% (at least in this draft) true heres the link to the draft version. . . it took forever to find btw and im not done reading it yet

wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com...

this is what ive found so far Page 18-19

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

(b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fundincluding five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, toaddress loss and damage from climate change impacts, including insurance,rehabilitation and compensatory components, (c) a Technology window; (d) a Mitigationwindow; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forestincentives relating to REDD actions.(c) The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes foradaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; (c) a short-term technologyaction plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body onadaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reportingand verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting andverification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer oftechnical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. Thesecretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre forinformation exchange.

Glad you found it. Now, check out Obama's talk to the U.N. in light of what you've just posted. Here's the link:

www.youtube.com...

I think i need a barf bag now omg its disgusting



FLAG THIS THREAD






[edit on 16-10-2009 by constantwonder]

I fear the signing of that document will be this countries death blow.After the last of our wealth is robbed we will be the third world...

Originally posted by AgentX09
I fear the signing of that document will be this countries death blow.After the last of our wealth is robbed we will be the third world...

That is the true aim of this. TBTB don't care about "Global Warming." That's nothing more than a trojan horse for totalitarianism which will result in our demise and the completion of the "one world" government.

Global Wealth Distribution sounds like Welfare to me on a global scale rather than a National one. People being given money for nothing.
No exchange of labour involved, nothing nada.

So we'll be slaving away through our labours and paying this global welfare to those who are non productive.

Sounds familiar?

Originally posted by Emerald The Paradigm
The New World Order and One World Government are a good thing for everyone.

U.S. sovereignty doesn't matter. We live in a new world, and it's better if everything in the world was done in a fair and concise manner rather than illegal wars and ponzi schemes by America.

The New World Order will take humanity farther than ever, and for people who think NWO is a bad thing, you are mistaken.

Right... so if another civilization from another planet was hell bent on ruling the universe in a facist dicatorship, and they decided that they wanted planet earth to give up it's sovereignty and come under their authority, even if it meant giving up our way of life, you would just go along with that?

Unfortunately One World Government will bring true meaning to the phrase 'Absolute power corrupts Absolutely'

People must understand the difference between cultural law and international law. International law is what the banks operate under.

This treaty, hands the lawmaking over to the banks.

A treaty is an agreement under international law entered into by actors in international law, namely sovereign states and international organizations. A treaty may also be known as: (international) agreement, protocol, covenant, convention, exchange of letters, etc. Regardless of the terminology, all of these international agreements under international law are equally treaties and the rules are the same. (Note that in United States constitutional law, the term "treaty" has a special meaning which is more restricted than its meaning in international law; see below.)
...
Treaties can be a violation of domestic law.

en.wikipedia.org...

Americans. If we don't rise up now, to stop the insanity,
we are only to blame ourselves.

Those of us who joined the military at one time in our
lives, were and are ready to give up our lives to protect
our freedoms and our future freedoms for our loved ones.

Those with family, those with friends. It is time.

[edit on 17-10-2009 by exposethosesecrets]

reply to post by Kaytagg

Originally posted by Kaytagg
This sounds dumb...

The "lie" they're selling us is that we owe a carbon debt to the third world.... and that all the wealth of the west is going to be "transfered" to the third world.... to compensate this debt...This is the craziest conspiracy theory I've ever heard come out of a British mouth.

Ok, well here is another crazy theory for you. Let’s say that the wealth IS distributed to 3rd world countries, and let’s say as part of the deal, those countries agree to have a UN nominated “administrator” take control of that country.

Now what if these administrators just happened to be the good little elites that have towed company line all these years, and now this is their reward.

The thing about elites is – they have all the money and power they need – it’s not about that – it’s about land!! Lots and lots of land! And when they have their land, they get to rule over the inhabitants.

Back to feudalism, that’s what the NWO agenda is. They want slaves, and they want to be the king. So to be a king, with loyal peasants, you need land, or more so, a country. And what are the easiest countries to take over without much fuss? Oh, the 3rd world of course!

It’s good to be the king…apparently.

Well then I would expect the world to come to a screaching halt.
and let the power struggle begin. we the people -vs- we the liars.
God let truth ring true and let all who deserve hell, achieve their goals of eternal damnation - may they get what they ask for in the most painful means possible. eye for eye as your law will be done.

Of course you understand that they will of necessity have to reduce the number of those sickening co2 generators, "us" down to a reasonable number. We are disgusting, trouble-making little varmints; especially the non-glorious, non-Muslem worms!

They'll teach your, "nasty" little girls with several cement blocks to the head America! Sorry for being graphic. Its just sad that the sheeple are them-selves to the end. There's going to be a lot of people wishing they'd have listened to us, "stupid conspiracy folk".

No consequencE..

Thank you.



[edit on 17-10-2009 by noconsequence]