It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sydney, Australia, September 14, 2009 - Truth Action Australia and 911oz.com will host the international conference The Hard Evidence to critically examine the three building collapses in New York on September 11, 2001. The official explanation of these building collapses 1, 2 and 7 of the World Trade Center Complex have been attributed primarily to fire damage causing a "global collapse" which independent scientific research has found an entirely insufficient explanation. A group of architects and engineers, approaching one thousand members, is demanding a new investigation of these building collapses based on hard physical evidence, witness testimony, video evidence and strict structural analysis using the original blueprints.
Originally posted by waypastvne
I will probably show up outside just because I've never seen a twoofer in real life.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
They can be incredibly book smart, but not have a lick of common sense.
I've worked with engineers for over 20 years and I've seen them make plenty of stupid mistakes when it comes to their jobs. Mistakes that have cost lives and resources. Blind faith in an engineer is a bad thing.
They can be incredibly book smart, but not have a lick of common sense.
926 architectural and engineering professionals
and 5116 other supporters including A&E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
Yahooooooo!!!! More foreign morons to demonstrate their ignorance.
Or are they just going to stand at a podium and rehash conspiracy theories that have been debunked? (my favorite is the yoyo who claimed in all seriousness that no airplane could have damaged the towers enough to fall....because the meteorite that crashed through the North Tower in the movie "Armaggedeon" didnt cause the tower to fall..so how could an airplane)
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by OmegaPoint
I've worked with engineers for over 20 years and I've seen them make plenty of stupid mistakes when it comes to their jobs. Mistakes that have cost lives and resources. Blind faith in an engineer is a bad thing.
They can be incredibly book smart, but not have a lick of common sense.
Next time you cross a bridge, fly in an aircraft,
Engineering is based on hundreds of years of accumulated practical knowledge, and applied theory to back up that practical experience.
Sure, many engineers wear odd socks, have some rather strange personalities, and food stains on their ties, but that does not make them all total fools
Never underestimate what an experienced bunch of engineers and architects can conclude from the forensic evidence of some horrific structural failure.
If you really want to know what happened during 9/11, hang George W Bush on a hook for twelve hours, zap him with some voltage, then water board him
You have until October 28 to learn French because French TV France 2’s “L’objet du scandale” with Guillaume Durand will air a historic debate over the official version of the 9/11 events.
On one side: 4 people with the hard task to defend the official version. On the other side, Jean-Marie Bigard, Mathieu Kassovitz, Éric Laurent and special guest Niels Harrit will tell France and the world why they don’t support the official theory and why they find it disturbing.
This is already a victory for the Bigard/Kassovitz camp who challenged the French media to organize a fair debate over 9/11 after being vilified by many French journalists because of their positions on 9/11. They have been called many names and even received death threats. But no serious journalist was able to challenge them on their positions and to seriously make a case against them based on facts. Now will be their chance, and like Bigard mentions in the below video, “good luck to them.”
This is also a victory for the 9/11 truth movement because the official US government conspiracy theory is supposedly not debatable. That’s what Bush said. That’s also what Obama said many times. The very fact of having a real open public debate, wherever that is, proves that the subject is debatable. And it needs to be debatable. The day we stop debating important topics is the day we surrender freedom.
Originally posted by waypastvne
But I dont want to pay them 60 AU$ at the door just for the pleasure of laughing at them.
Melbourne
Featuring: Richard Gage (AIA), Paul Mason (Structural Engineer), John Bursill (Aircraft Engineer)
When: Tuesday, 17th of November
Where: Victorian Trades Hall (New Council Chamber), Lygon Street on the corner of Victoria Street, Carlton South
Time: 7pm till 10pm (Please be a little early)
Cost: Free - $10 Donation suggested (covering the costs)