posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 06:43 AM
Yet another thread about something on 9/11 that just "looks wrong" or "feels wrong". Wake up, this isn't evidence of anything.
What bank of visual data can possibly be relied upon to make the claim, posited above, that this must be remote piloted? Can somebody show me images
of a remote piloted plane being flown into a target like the WTC? Or are you just subconsciously channelling decades of film and TV to produce a
conclusion about what you think things should look like?
As for the no plane stuff, I feel for you (slightly) more sane Truthers. But then, you do kind of deserve them.