It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An unusual fish, previously unknown was discovered recently off Brazils Bahia coast.
The fish is over 6 feet long, with a long tail was found floating in the sea by researchers from the TAMAR Project, a sea turtle conservation project.
TAMAR project coordinator Guy Marcovaldi captured the first images of the fish, which was dead and lying near the surface of the water. His special underwater camera is normally used for tracking and filming sea turtles.
Specialists observing the fish told Brazils TV Globo the animal weighs about 88 pounds (40 kilos).
It has small teeth and no scales. Due to its large body fat content and gelatinous consistency, researchers do not believe it would be edible.
Oarfish are large, greatly elongated, pelagic Lampriform comprising the small family Regalecidae. Found in all temperate to tropical oceans yet rarely seen, the oarfish family contains four species in two genera. One of these, the king of herrings (Regalecus glesne), is listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest bony fish alive, at up to 11 metres (36 ft) in length.
The common name oarfish is presumably in reference to either their highly compressed and elongated bodies, or to the former (but now discredited) belief that the fish "row" themselves through the water with their pelvic fins. The family name Regalecidae is derived from the Latin regalis, meaning "royal". The occasional beachings of oarfish after storms, and their habit of lingering at the surface when sick or dying, make oarfish a probable source of many sea serpent tales.
Although the larger species are considered game fish and are (to a minor extent) fished commercially, oarfish are rarely caught alive; their flesh is not well regarded due to its gelatinous consistency.
Anatomy and morphology
Oarfish that washed ashore on a Bermuda beach in 1860. The animal was 16 feet (4.9 m) long and was originally described as a sea serpent.
The tapering, ribbony silver bodies of oarfish—together with an impressive, pinkish to cardinal red dorsal fin—help explain the perception of majesty taken from rare encounters. The dorsal fin originates from above the (relatively small) eyes and runs the entire length of the fish. Of the approximately 400 dorsal fin rays, the first 10 to 12 are elongated to varying degrees, forming a trailing crest embellished with reddish spots and flaps of skin at the ray tips. The pelvic fins are similarly elongated and adorned, reduced to 1 to 5 rays each. The pectoral fins are greatly reduced and situated low on the body. The anal fin is completely absent and the caudal fin may be reduced or absent as well, with the body tapering to a fine point. All fins lack true spines. At least one account, from researchers in New Zealand, describes the oarfish as giving off "electric shocks" when touched.
Like other members of its order, the oarfish has a small yet highly protrusible oblique mouth with no visible teeth. The body is scaleless and the skin covered with easily abraded, silvery guanine. In the streamer fish (Agrostichthys parkeri), the skin is clad with hard tubercles. All species lack gas bladders and the number of gill rakers is variable.
Oarfish coloration is also variable; the flanks are commonly covered with irregular bluish to blackish streaks, black dots, and squiggles. These markings quickly fade following death. The king of herrings is by far the largest member of the family at a published total length of 11 meters (with unconfirmed reports of 15 meters or more) and 272 kilograms in weight. The streamer fish is known to reach 3 meters total length whilst the largest recorded specimen of Regalecus russelii measured just 5.5 centimeters standard length. It is probable that this little-known species can regularly reach a maximum length of at least 15.2 meters (50 ft).
Originally posted by sumgai
reply to post by warrenb
I believe we're going to be seeing a lot of new species of animals on this Earth due the increasing pollution. With all the chemicals and chemical waste being pumped into the atmosphere and dumped into the oceans, the existing species we have not will have no choice but to evolve and adapt to their changing environments. What we're seeing is evidence of Darwinism.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by sumgai
reply to post by warrenb
I believe we're going to be seeing a lot of new species of animals on this Earth due the increasing pollution. With all the chemicals and chemical waste being pumped into the atmosphere and dumped into the oceans, the existing species we have not will have no choice but to evolve and adapt to their changing environments. What we're seeing is evidence of Darwinism.
I have the same view. I believe that evolution can happen very
suddenly as well as over long periods of time. There really is no
telling what the dumping of all our chemicals will do to life in the
sea. Life is amazing and will often surprise us. This may be no
different.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by sumgai
reply to post by warrenb
I believe we're going to be seeing a lot of new species of animals on this Earth due the increasing pollution. With all the chemicals and chemical waste being pumped into the atmosphere and dumped into the oceans, the existing species we have not will have no choice but to evolve and adapt to their changing environments. What we're seeing is evidence of Darwinism.
I have the same view. I believe that evolution can happen very
suddenly as well as over long periods of time. There really is no
telling what the dumping of all our chemicals will do to life in the
sea. Life is amazing and will often surprise us. This may be no
different.
Someone said it looked like an oarfish, I agree. maybe a cross
between that and a megamouth shark. neat find, I love this kind
of stuff.
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by Donny 4 million
Actually current theories in evolution suggest that animals can adapt quite quickly...DNA suggests that the shift from wolf to dog happened within a couple of decades.
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by Donny 4 million
Actually there are currents in evolutionary science that suggest that under the right circumstances evolution can happen quite quickly without human intervention...like in a sudden drop in species and the opening up of new ecologically niches.
Originally posted by the illuminator
isnt it amazing the things we still have to discover that God has created