It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ugie1028
i was referring to the evidence that proves that WTC7 was brought down by structural failure.
It came down and fell into its own footprint like a demolition, WTC1 and 2 also went down like a controlled demolition.
“while debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7.”
www.nist.gov...
"As for fuel fires, the team found that they could not have been sustained long enough, could not have generated sufficient heat to fail a critical column..."
Originally posted by ugie1028
[EDIT: im not answering to you anymore, i see your in lines with a few trolls on this forum.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
You asked for proof that wreckage from WTC 1 fell and hit WTC 7 and I showed it to you. When I say these protestors are using bad information (I.E. not knowing even after eight years that WTC 1 fell on WTC 7) in order to get people to believe what they themselves want to believe, you haven't proven me wrong.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You can't believe the likes of "GoodOlDave". People like him spread purposeful misinformation, knowing they're wrong and/or not researched enough to know what they're talking about.
As for the fuel fires, NIST had this to say:
www.nist.gov...
"As for fuel fires, the team found that they could not have been sustained long enough, could not have generated sufficient heat to fail a critical column..."
Originally posted by ugie1028
you see, the trolls on this thread IGNORE those facts.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by ugie1028
you see, the trolls on this thread IGNORE those facts.
My, isn't *this* a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Bonez had generously pointed out the NIST report, which specifically said that runaway fires DID lead to the destruction of WTC 7, and that any explosives powerful enough to destroy WTC 7 would necessarily have been loud enough to have been blatantly heard. Most importantly, this document was published on 8-21-08, over ONE YEAR AGO.
Thank you.
Originally posted by ugie1028
Stop trolling my thread!
Originally posted by CannotGoHome
This is directed at GoodOlDave.
Have you any idea of the strength of steel ? Have you ever heated a length of steel with a 2500 deg torch in order to make a bend. Have you ever tried to strike a welded joint with a massive hammer to seperate two pieces of metal,
secondly there is no way there would have been a perfect symmetrical collapse. not once - three times - three buildings.
GoodOlDave I bet you also believe that the pentagon plane wings folded neatly back and entered the hole before vapourising.
Originally posted by ugie1028
He falls in line with (ridiculed stage) because he is blinded by the OS and his love for the govt, when he should be for the people and supporting them....
Sad... just sad.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
In short, Bonez is deliberately cutting and pasting his information out of context, selecting what he wants others to know while concealing information which, if he had revealed it, it would prove the exact opposite of what he intended to convince people of- runaway fires DID lead to the destruction of WTC 7, it's just the fires wasn't from the fuel from the backup generators.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Bonez is LYING when he attempts to claim that NIST supports his claims of controlled demolitions, because it doesn't!