It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
We know regular themite works - we also know that it would have taken tons of the stuff to do what you think it would have done, plus with no easy way to initiate it.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
Originally posted by hooper
We know regular themite works - we also know that it would have taken tons of the stuff to do what you think it would have done, plus with no easy way to initiate it.
So it would take tons and tons of thermite to do what you all claim office fires did?
Yeah OK...
Originally posted by hooper
Which was done by virtue of crashing a huge jetliner into them, filled with highly flammable jet fuel at an enormous rate of speed, say 400+ miles per hour. Thus casuing, as you so coyly put it "small office fires".
You take your pick.
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by hooper
Actually, you have to have the same resistance underneath the falling portion as you do in free air in order for the building to not fall to one side or another.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
reply to post by pteridine
Can you show me proof, other than internet quotes, that carbon fire can cause construction steel to fail?
I dismiss your quote on the grounds of appealing to authority.
Do you understand any of this enough to show evidence of your claims without appealing to authority? Can you explain, in your own words, how office fires caused thousand of tons of construction steel to instantly and symmetrically collapse.
You're not debating with any real knowledge of science but from a refusal to believe your government would do such a thing. That's dangerous thinking.
Originally posted by KleptoPsychotic
reply to post by turbofan
Yea, it's getting to the point where they want you to believe someone with 150 bullet holes died from getting hit by lightening. The thermate chips are the bullet casings, littering the ground.
Originally posted by hooper
2) You've unilaterally categorized the fires as "office fires" therefore negating the existance of jet fuel without offering direct evidence to support this assumption.
Originally posted by hooper
1) Steel is the product of "carbon fire".
2) You've unilaterally categorized the fires as "office fires" therefore negating the existance of jet fuel without offering direct evidence to support this assumption.
Engineering professor Forman Williams will say the jet fuel “burned for maybe 10 minutes.” (Chertoff et al. 3/2005)
most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperatures above 250ºC NIST
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Wally Hope
Please tell me exactly how many tons of "construction steel" needed to fail, unless of course you think that every piece of steel in the towers needed to be compromised by heat in order to initiate the collapse, in which case we have to go back to the drawing board with this.