Steel Piece Proves Lie - NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel

Originally posted by bsbray11

It takes a certain amount of intellectual and emotional maturity to be able to restrain yourself from insulting others in every single one of your posts, and an even greater amount of maturity to not even feel the desire to insult others as you speak with them.

That, or an utter disdain for those who are terrorist apologists, slanderers, etc...

Actually, it takes a very arrogant person to thinnk that they have an expert level of knowledge in structural engineering, when they are an EE student. All gained from Google University, no doubt.

Sorry kid, but your c.v. shows nothing........

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Now prove that molten steel was found at GZ.

Proove that it wasn't. Oh wow, now you have the burden of proof.
I'm just as guilty of conjecture as NIST here because I wasn't there, so I have to rely on expert eyewitness testimony, and pretty clear photographic evidence to substantiate the presence of molten steel in the debris, and I'm supposed to discard this on the basis of what? Some guy on a forum? A NIST man that basicly calls these other witnesess liars? Was Mr. Gross on site, or is he full of the same stuff?

Why can you guys not attack the information instead of the posters here?
Seriously, why? You keep accusing of of being traitors, yet you exhault those who are right now, getting away with it. What's so treacherous about wanting to know the 'truth'? NIST's conjectures are IMPOSSIBLE.

Twofers... you pick that up on some talking head television show or is that something you cooked up yourself, not only is it insulting and childish, but Truther isn't a word, and twofer, well that isn't even acceptable slang unless you're just using it to insult others.

Sorry fellers, molten steel was confirmed by people who know what steel is, photographed, and widely reported long before Mr. Gross slapped them in the face with this hawg wash.

[edit on 29-8-2009 by twitchy]

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That, or an utter disdain for those who are terrorist apologists, slanderers, etc...

"Terrorist apologist" suggests you have definitive proof that this was all solely the work of Muslim extremists. Which you don't.

And of course this comment is followed by another personal attack. What's your major again, Joey?

posted by SPreston

Let's get that investigation going, so we can hang the 9-11 perpetrators and their many co-conspirators and damage control artists and disinformation specialists.

posted by Joey Canoli

I say let's give all the terrorist apologist, treasonous, slanderous, libelous, troofers 2 more years to accomplish this.

If they fail, let them be subject to their own preferred punishment for these imaginary perps.

Would you go for this?

posted by Joey Canoli

BTW, where's your statement to SPreston? I guess if he agrees with your view, then it's fine to make statements about hanging people that have differing opinions?

What's the problem?

Did you think that 9-11 perpetrators and their many co-conspirators and damage control artists and disinformation specialists applied to you?

I wonder why?

If 9-11 turns out to be an Inside Job, then the 9-11 perpetrators and their many co-conspirators and damage control artists and disinformation specialists would all be co-conspirators and guilty of treason wouldn't they?

Treason in a time of war calls for the death penalty does it not? American citizens were murdered during this treason were they not?

John Gross did deliberately lie. Other members of NIST did lie.

The 9-11 Whitewash Commission did ignore the 503 1st responder testimonies and their 19,000 pages of eyewitness accounts describing explosions and demolition. Those 503 1st responders were willing and wanted to testify before the Commission under oath. The cover-up of treason would also be treason wouldn't it?

Do you still think it applies to you?

Originally posted by twitchy

Proove that it wasn't.

I'll pass. It's pointless to tell you again that you don't have proof pools of molten steel, or whatever. You only have opinions.

Anyways, unless you prove it, nobody will accept the CT view about 9/11.

This is a fact you cannot deny.

Originally posted by bsbray11

"Terrorist apologist" suggests you have definitive proof that this was all solely the work of Muslim extremists. Which you don't.

And traitor. I forgot to add that part.

BTW, your own personal belief about 9/11 is irrelevant.

If the citizens of the USA decide that 9/11 CTerz are wastes of protoplasm, similar to what Germany, etc did with Holocaust Deniers, you boys are in for a heap o' trouble.

The HD folks were just as sincere in their beliefs as are you guys, but look where that got them. Incarcerated. Here, that would get you a new boyfriend too. Good luck with that....

Originally posted by SPreston

What's the problem?

Did you think that 9-11 perpetrators and their many co-conspirators and damage control artists and disinformation specialists applied to you?

Who knows.

You guys are clearly all over the map with your emotional responses - as demonstrated by the excessive use of all caps and bolding, every post looking like a spam response, and repeated use of the same photos in posts - that I wouldn't trust YOU guys to make a rational decision. And anyone rational would never swallow the inside job garbage anyways. That leaves the clearly irrational in charge of who's a shill or not.

Just look at Rob Balsamo and Mark Roberts. He clearly threatened him. Mark has also had to have police action against, I believe, 3 people.

That's the deal there SPreston. You guys are irrational. You will never get your way. The irrational do irrational things. If given the chance, I absolutely believe that one of them will end up killing someone they belive is a shill when they don't get their way, all in the name of twoof.

IMHO, you're walking a fine line by spewing this stuff. It JUST might be considered incitement.

You might want to tone it down a bit, and cut out the hanging part. Just stick to trials, etc, before you put the wrong ideas into someone's fragile mind.

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
You might want to tone it down a bit, and cut out the hanging part. Just stick to trials, etc, before you put the wrong ideas into someone's fragile mind.

I have to wonder if you would be so adamant about "twoofers" being incited against?

FBI investigating Michael Reagan for threatening 9/11 truther

californiafaultline.wordpress.com...

What say you Joey?

reply to post by Joey Canoli

You might want to tone it down a bit, and cut out the hanging part. Just stick to trials, etc, before you put the wrong ideas into someone's fragile mind.

You guys are clearly all over the map with your emotional responses

Pal, you need to chill! Perhaps you need to take a break, so the truth can sink in. Anger is normal when discovering the truth and realizing you have been betrayed.

AS far as “emotional responses” You may want to practices what you preach.

Hey everyone,

I had a ideal, I don't know if any of you out there are remote viewers, or even believe in remote viewing.

Well my though is that if there are any remote viewers out there, would any of you be interested in trying to remote veiw to WTC, right before it fell, and see what was burning and how it was burning.

I myself am a remote viewer, and have studied the blue prints of the towers, I'm think if could go and look at what was happening, if thermite was burning, could possibily have a better insite as to what really happened.

If anyone else is interest, plese let us know what you come up with, I will do same.

There is one thing some of the Govnment remote viewer had some problems, when they sent them on mission to view, the Lockerbie incident in Scotland, some of them never totally recovered the mental trama.

Good luck

[edit on 2-9-2009 by googolplex]