It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by michaelhernsin
OK THIS IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE TOPIC AT HAND. BUT I HAVE A QUESTION FROM EXPERIENCE.
since most are talking about meditating, and spiritual development.
A few times when i have meditated, i have hummed the mantra Om Mani Padme hum. In a very low, frequency. Not for very long but i do it for a good amount of time.
when i DO DO IT, most of the times (and some without) i will get into a very deep meditative state.
I can only describe it as below;
I see darkness, and all the sudden a DARKER than black circle appears in my eyes. I am not imagining it to do anything, im not pretending to create something with my own imagination, it simply has a "mind of its own".
now the little black circle grows somewhat like a nucleus splits. And all the sudden around the little black circle color starts to appear. I can never describe how pure, the colors are. So vivid so sharp, so bright and just BEAUTIFUL. the color isn't just a Vision, i can only describe to you that i FEEL IT...i FEEL THE COLORS, a sort of happiness drips down upon me like the mornings dew.
From that, all the sudden it shifts to usually dark purples, to bright purples, to light blue, to dark blue. This is still small circles.
Recently (3 days ago) the same thing happened, and it was my full vision. My entire vision what would seem to be like LIVING in a lava lamp, with a rave going on, on extacy, on a planet in space.
lol literally amazing and breathtaking. I couldn't hold on to it, i got somewhat freaked out and amazed, that i broke out of the meditation and haven't done it since.
WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THIS? ANYONE?...
Originally posted by michaelhernsin
def. have to check that vid. out
where can i watch it? anywhere free online?
Originally posted by manmaidslave
actually the 4th dimension is time, we need to discover the 5th.
Originally posted by Dean Goldberry
The ultimate proof of the 4th dimension/density, I believe, would be if a large structure, megalithic or otherwise, were to instantaneously materialize on Earth. It would prove that intelligent action (work) happens outside linear time (like in an old Star Trek episode with a hot blonde with a green dress with a cut-out side, lotsa skin). I have a history of unexplained experiences. The most common theme is missing time, but there have been other instances where an object was different, moved or rearranged, in my apartment or elsewhere, where there was no discernable missing time. Those would be known as time bubbles. No one here (at least yet) knows what all would qualify as the 4th dimension.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by googolplex
How can something be contained within an infinite nothingness?
Originally posted by thomas_
But it's more or less what they use to explain and justify it's existence, and that is exactly where people get trapped and get everything wrong. There is no 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th in a independent way. All of them are one, why?
Because if were talking physics here in the 1st hypothetical dimension a single line with a internal infinite boundlessness is impossible without the 2nd, 3rd and 4th dimensions. The 2nd isn't possible without the 1st, 3rd and 4th. The 3rd isn't possible without the 1st, 2nd and 4th and the 4th isn't possible without 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
See, even thought a line might only connect two points in a single direction and plane this line must have a height, a width and a length and be present in time to exist. Otherwise it's nothing and everything at the same time. Same goes for a square a cube or a hypercube. So all of what they talk is just silly talk.
What they use to describe and argue about the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th dimensions is merely a matter of how we perceive things within this dimension that has the four at all times.
What separates things (dimension, planes) is not space, but frequency.
Sagan, Kaku and every single scientist/physicist that insists in this theory of a fourth dimension using flatland as it's basis and treating the first three dimensions as independent is just wrong and blind by nature. They should all just re-evaluate what the 1st, 2nd and 3rd with time (4th) are before trying to explain a "4th" dimension that isn't time it self.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by googolplex
How can something be contained within an infinite nothingness? I've thought about this, and I think that in fact the nothing must permeate and give rise to something, whereby the idea of something outside of a bounded universe, is meaningless, in the same way that time is meaningless within the context of infinity.