It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers
What type and amount of evidence would it take for someone of Religious faith to stop believing?
no other name on earth does that for people this much i know for a fact. so why would i not believe? and he met his wife thru the church. i'll never for4get the look on my partners face , like someone just made the biggest liar out of him. i stiill see the guy to this day happy ever after. truly amazing.
If God isn't real, then why is he the most attacked figure on the planet? There are other religions around the world but I don't see anyone lashing out at zeus everytime something goes wrong in their life.
What will it take for you to Stop Believing!?
There seems to be more, and more, and more substantiating evidence, mounting that Deities and such, are not real...
wtf. why do you write like keeanu reeves talks?
Dude what's to say that the guy just felt better having met a decent babe had good sex and was now expecting new life ?
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by moocowman
wtf. why do you write like keeanu reeves talks?
Dude what's to say that the guy just felt better having met a decent babe had good sex and was now expecting new life ?
or may be your suffering from some kind of mental disorder.
i thought it was clear, that he met her after he gave his life to the lord.
who said anything about presenting evidence. what's wrong w/ you?
weird.....
Originally posted by AshleyD
What will it take for you to Stop Believing!?
Nothing. There is absolutely nothing you can do at all whatsoever. You are completely powerless to stop me from believing in and having a relationship with my God. So I guess just sit there and twiddle your thumbs or pluck one strand of your hair out at a time in frustration because nothing is going to change my mind. It's out of your control.
There seems to be more, and more, and more substantiating evidence, mounting that Deities and such, are not real...
Really? Because all I ever hear from atheists is 'You can't prove a negative.' And are you not familiar with physics? There is a reason why some physicists have said the more they study the science, the more they believe in a higher power. Life-long atheists have changed their views once they come to know the rational intelligibility of the universe. Then I see detailed prophecy being fulfilled before my eyes. I have also seen God take an active role in my life that defies external explanation.
I really wish atheists would just get over it. You're powerless. You can't do anything about it. You cannot squash the belief in God no matter how often you throw around the words, 'Lunatics, retard, pink unicorns, Santa Claus,' and all the other insults I saw just briefly skimming the OP and a couple of other posts.
This thread gives atheists a bad name and is a reason why so many of you have a reputation for being preachy and self righteous. It's the 'Neener neener neener. Look at the insane theists believing in sky fairies while we over here hold the patent in logic and critical thinking' vibe devout atheists give off.
If atheists don't want to believe, if agnostics aren't sure what to believe, and if theists believe, then leave it at that. When one resorts to ridicule like hurling insults such as lunatics and retards, that shows me a lack of confidence in their beliefs. It's the classic bully complex: Tear others down so you feel better about yourself. In this case, tear down the beliefs of others so you feel more confident in your own beliefs.
It's threads like this that give atheism a religious, evangelistic feel to it.
2. Evangelical Atheist
See asshole
An evangelical atheist is one who not only believes there is no god or other supreme being, but is obsessed with convincing everyone around them to become an atheist too, usually through hard-line intolerance (the kind they accuse other religions of). When cornered they usually try to put down their opponent's religion and bash them for 'blind faith', not realizing that their belief that there is no god is no more or less valid or provable than the other guy's belief that there is one.
Not to be confused with normal atheists/agnostics, who for the most part just don't talk about religion and accept the beliefs of those around them as their prerogative. Evangelical atheists are particularly common on the Internet, as organized religion is generally accepted as part of 'the system' of global human society, and lately it's become cool on the Internet to hate 'the system'.
Evangelical atheist usually seeks to "convert" borderline theists, often by engaging in debate with fundamentalists.
Nevertheless, some of the brightest minds in the English-speaking world right now argue that religion is the problem. And we know they’re the brightest minds because they keep telling us they are. The New Atheists are positively evangelical. They want to make a convert out of you, although if you’re a “dyed-in-the-wool faith-head” they’ll settle for peppering you with insults and sarcasm instead.
What is most worrying is that the New Atheists seem to gain the most followers precisely among the most ambitious and intelligent young people—the people who will be actively shaping government policy in the years to come. Attracted by the intellectual rebelliousness of the movement, young people fall for its insidious message: join us and you can be one of the smart people.
In the 1800s, Karl Marx and other thinkers systematized this anti-religious hostility. When the followers of Marx gained power in Russia, they were even more ruthless than the French revolutionaries in their suppression of religion. Similar horrors followed dogmatic Communism wherever it came to power.
But most of the English-speaking world was spared this excessive institutional atheism. The United States, in particular, has always zealously guarded the freedom of anyone to practice any religion that does not seriously interfere with public order.
That’s why we’re so surprised and baffled by what we call the New Atheism. For the first time in our relatively tranquil history, we’re facing a determined attempt not just to keep organized religion out of government (which most religious Americans agree is a good idea), but to suppress religion completely.
What we call the “New Atheism” is a bit different than its predecessor. It’s more aggressive, and it has more power. The leaders of the sect are well placed in the academic world, and they have a strong determination to mold government policy.
And you wouldn’t like the government if the New Atheists molded its policy. Richard Dawkins has asserted that teaching your religion to your child is a form of child abuse and should be criminalized. Other New Atheists have argued that churches should have to post a sign reading “for entertainment purposes only,” since after all they’re no less a fraud than telephone psychics.
The New Atheists see religion as a disease to be exterminated. Their dream, in short, is not a government neutral to religion, but a government actively hostile to religion. The evangelical atheists assume that religion must inevitably breed mindless fanaticism. Countering that image means not just answering the atheists’ arguments against God, but also correcting their false impressions of religion.
hey ya know what? you just might be right mocoman. i was just thinking,
Obviously it wasn't clear what was meant by "giving his life to the lord" you have to appreciate that , you may write like Ted Haggard talks and I may not necessarily be fully conversant in xtian speakology