It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by dooper
I always said if it were on me or one of my family, and emergency traumatic surgery were required, I'd rather a SF Medic do the heavy lifting and let the pretty boys with their medical diplomas close.
Yeah. They're THAT good.
My vote is for PJs, ever since one stitched up my thumb when I was about four years old!
Originally posted by SFwife
PJ'S ??? What honey no one is better than an 18D period
Which of course they all go through the same course at some point
When you have a Dr. in a civilian ER ask for the help of a 18D in training that says a lot b/c YES they are just that dang good
Originally posted by aorAki
Mind you, I'm against soldiers anyway, seeing as they are the lapdogs of the elite.
Originally posted by aorAki
Just another example of why we don't deserve to live on this Planet seeing as we have a disregard for ALL life.
Originally posted by aorAki
You know the best way to save soldiers lives? Don't send them to fight in the first place.
Originally posted by jerico65
Keep in mind the number of people that have been saved at one point or another due to some medical procedure that has been developed on the battlefield.
Originally posted by aorAki
On the surface that looks like a reasonable claim, until you consider the possibility that these techniques would have been developed with or without battlefield trauma services (TM).