Dan Burisch's July 16 statement regarding H1N1/H5N1 as a Biodefense Weapon

I have directed this post to be made public. We are aware of what is going on, and David can confirm I had hard biological material with me to describe the H1N1/H5N1 issue and lack of biomarkers present which I would expect for a biodefense weapon. I also told him, somewhat directly, that my experience has indicated that should either of these two viruses have been a biodefense weapon, those whom I have known would have been fired for incompetence, due to lack of mortality rate.

...

I will not argue the validity of basic germ theory, an underlying motive from only a few (amongst the many good people) we encountered, in any effort to counter their "belief system." Germ theory is our best explanation given the empirical evidence. Period. One can argue "scalar waves" or transient reality variations, all they want, but VIRUSES EXIST. Period.

This was something, quite frankly, I thought had been long ago put to rest, right along with wondering if rats and mice could be spontaneously generated from piles of dirty rags. Simply put, resistance and immunity all have different levels, and the materials (such as vaccines) must be applied correctly to receive the desired immunity, in an effort to protect the wider population. After the panel, in Zurich, I was asked, "What would you do if some places in your country mandated vaccinations?" I responded, 'They do. Schools require it. Every public school I ever entered or entered a child into, required it.'

...

We have been suggested many things which we should say. The most sensible and simple of which is that "we oppose mandatory vaccinations." Well, we do oppose mandatory vaccinations on a personal level of choice, but the world and these issues are much more complicated than would allow for us to make such a blanket statement, regarding the ethical/moral implications for whole societies. Where does any given society have the right, as a whole, to make a decision for its own best benefits? Who is keeping anyone a member of that society, once such decisions are made? Who relieves anyone of their responsibility to DO SOMETHING about conditions they feel are wrong?

...

(Moreover...Marcia and I are doing what we can, with a cutting edge project, we call Project Isis...in a near future attempt to help people. We don't believe, that in the 21st century, we should be having to use NEEDLES AT ALL! We see a future for humanity where disease prevention, diagnosis/treatment, is done with the use of LIGHT and SOUND. Help us, help us get there? Let us know if you wish to.)

...

Could it mean that the real conspiracy is 100% the opposite than being described by a few (in comparison to the true population)? Could vaccinations be a threat, for other reasons? In our continuance of telling you all the truth, we have come across evidence, real evidence, of what might be behind some of the recent ongoings - including H1N1 - and we will report it publicly, BUT NOT BEFORE the information is trackable. Too many people say "I heard..." I have done the same, but have tried to parse out the quality of evidence, and be OPEN with what is more credible or less credible. But...too many say "I heard" and other people take that as Gospel, when it is not! We, at Eagles Disobey, try to qualify information BEFORE we pass it along...

www.projectcamelot.org...

...i hope that's not too long of a quote, but i thought it was the most important parts of the statement, because i know not everyone follows the links when they can get the main bulk of the points from the quote...

anyway, i found this to be very interesting, and i'm wondering what everyone else thinks of this, too - i performed a Search and couldn't find this posted already...

does anyone think he's wrong or just blowing his horn, or do you think there's lots of truth to what he's got to say?

[edit on 20-7-2009 by adrenochrome]

I do NOT like the talk going around now: Civil war and mandatory Vaccinations in Norway. ???

InterNet Outage during Mandatory Vaccinations in Sweeden

I heard talk about this on Veritas and Procect camelot, even on Hegnar.no forums I saw this talk..

reply to post by ChemBreather


did you read what he said though?...

I had hard biological material with me to describe the H1N1/H5N1 issue and lack of biomarkers present which I would expect for a biodefense weapon. I also told him, somewhat directly, that my experience has indicated that should either of these two viruses have been a biodefense weapon, those whom I have known would have been fired for incompetence, due to lack of mortality rate.

...maybe i'm not reading it right, but it sounds to me that he wouldn't use H1N1/H5N1 as a biodefense weapon because the mortality rate's not high enough for it - he'd probably use something more efficient if he was going to wipe out bits of humanity...

...he's being slightly sarcastic!

reply to post by adrenochrome


I understood it completely......The virus is not the weapon......Its the vaccine

reply to post by adrenochrome


Ehhh, I just wanted to add more info ..

The vaccine seems to be the 'danger', too many articles speak of more deaths BY the vaccine rather than the FLU it self..

reply to post by Cloudsinthesky


Yea, and I think the chemtrails are involved too, in the way of Lowering peoples ability to Fight the Flu and so it will spread much more easly.

Think about it, Sunblock/cloud seeding? sounds awesome, a fight against a Lie about manmade Gloabal Warming, and what happens is the we do not get the Sun light we Need to stay healthy....

Again, that way , this Flu can spread fairly easy..

He makes a good point about his reasons for believing H1N1 isn't a weapon, but I was pretty confused about the rest of his statement.

reply to post by kadugen


exactly! i still think some are misunderstanding his statement though - he believes the H1N1/H5N1 vaccines aren't good enough to have a high mortality rate - he thinks there are better ways that the government can use to wipe out humanity...