Even mainstream news doubt about the first moon landing

Even mainstream news doubt about the first moon landing

edition.cnn.com

- It captivated millions of people around the world for eight days in the summer of 1969. It brought glory to the embattled U.S. space program and inspired beliefs that anything was possible.


Moon landing hoax theorists point to the "rippling" flag as evidence the landings were faked.
1 of 2

It's arguably the greatest technological feat of the 20th century.

And to some, it was all a lie.

Forty years after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin set foot on the moon, a small cult of conspiracy theorists maintains the historic event -- and the five subsequent Apollo moon landings -- wer

(visit the link for the full news article)

How deep we dig, more info about the real technical achievement behind moon travel starts to amaze a generation of people who can do more than believe on the news and just repeat the stories without questions.

Despite some broad conspirationists, few people, like Hoagland and others, have enough scientific knowledge to, at least, develop alternative ways of thinking.

Now, the main stream media have enough people with open mind behind the trenchs. The truth could be different then what ours parents told us...

edition.cnn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

How misleading. "Even mainstream news doubt about the first moon landing". How did you get that from this article? This is an article on the fact that there are those who consider the moon landing a hoax. There is nothing in that article that who lead anyone to believe that the author, or anyone else in the MSM, is beginning to question the fact that we landed on the moon.

Originally posted by felipeb
Despite some broad conspirationists, few people, like Hoagland and others, have enough scientific knowledge to, at least, develop alternative ways of thinking.

Yeah they have 'alternative ways' of thinking. Usually those are debunked and shotdown immediately but for the religous hoax crowds that rarely matters. It's like telling a faithfull person that there is no god

I have doubts if man indeed landed on the moon the first time, at least not the first time because too many things were at stake and failure was not an option.

I think the rippling flag is the biggest thing that gives the game away, that and the 'moon dust' has the wrong physics when it's being kicked up.

There is supposedly no atmosphere on the moon... no wind, no anything.

All these Indian and Japanese moon missions- they still haven't released their data, and probably never will. I think the Japanese controllers has postponed releasing even 1 or a few more pictures for another 18 months, which strikes me as incredibly odd.

As far as I know only one HDTV video was released by the Japanese team, no images. If the Japanese people funded the space missions they got ripped off royally, as did the Indians, just like the Americans are getting ripped off.

There are definitely a lot of anomalies on the moon, knowledge of which may very well bring down the PTB.

Originally posted by star in a jar
I have doubts if man indeed landed on the moon the first time, at least not the first time because too many things were at stake and failure was not an option.

I think the rippling flag is the biggest thing that gives the game away, that and the 'moon dust' has the wrong physics when it's being kicked up.

There is supposedly no atmosphere on the moon... no wind, no anything.

All these Indian and Japanese moon missions- they still haven't released their data, and probably never will. I think the Japanese controllers has postponed releasing even 1 or a few more pictures for another 18 months, which strikes me as incredibly odd.

As far as I know only one HDTV video was released by the Japanese team, no images. If the Japanese people funded the space missions they got ripped off royally, as did the Indians, just like the Americans are getting ripped off.

There are definitely a lot of anomalies on the moon, knowledge of which may very well bring down the PTB.

Nah the cgi just wasn't believeable enough, plus they messed up the timings on the surface movement in relation to the earth rise and set moving to fast compared to the "lunar" surface.

Wait till you find out there is no space, just a really high ceiling...disclosure will really loose it's appeal then.

Peace

Omg they had cgi in the 60's? The conspiracy must be way bigger than I thought

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Omg they had cgi in the 60's? The conspiracy must be way bigger than I thought

No, but in 2007 they did, which is the footage I was speaking of...


How true is your signature?

Don't forget the lens cap...Peace

[edit on 18-7-2009 by letthereaderunderstand]

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Omg they had cgi in the 60's? The conspiracy must be way bigger than I thought

well ... if it was faked, it wasnt with a computer genious ...

reply to post by felipeb


Your subject is misleading, CNN has done no such thing in this report. It merely reports that there are people out there who do not believe it.

Do not mistake them reporting this with "them" affording validity to such a crackpot conspiracy theory.

Its people who perpetuate this drivel who end up writing off far more likely conspiracy theories on the basis that most people simply ignore after hearing nonsense like "the moon landings were a hoax".

It isn't subjective or a matter of opinion. Man went to the Moon in the Apollo Programme. Fact.

Some people will never be convinced, thats their lookout but don't look for acceptance where it doesn't exist!

reply to post by letthereaderunderstand


Oh thought you meant the original moon footages. And my signature is the one and absolute truth