It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
So in other words your just moving the cost of income tax from one side to another? So at the end of the day it doesnt make any difference really, unless ofcourse you dont use fuel? And what happens if there isnt enough to pay for the roads due to less demand? What then? Too bad?
Do you think your taxes just pays for roads, for public schools, for the military? Theres a long list and yet you folks cant find the common sense to actually look it up.
Converting tax from one side to another is all of a sudden going to solve the issue. You fail to realize the influx of americans across the Canadian and mexican borders for fuel on a daily basis as well. Seriously now.
The fiscal year 2004 federal budget is about $2 trillion. The spending in percentages this year looks like this:
26.2%—military
22.6%—interest on the debt
19%—health care
5.5%—income security
3.4%—veterans’ benefits
3.3%—education
2.5%—nutrition spending
1.6%—housing
1.6%—environment
11.4%—everything else
Looking at it a different way, if you had $1,500 deducted from your paychecks as an “income” tax and your tax dollars were directly applied to government expenses, your contributions by category would be:
$393—military
$339—interest on national debt
$285—healthcare
$83—income security
$51—veterans’ benefits
$48—education
$38—nutrition spending
$24—housing
$24—environmental protection
$216—everything else
But, if the Grace Commission is correct, then not one penny of income tax money is actually being spent on services the American People expect their government to provide.
So what is funding government? Tax researcher Richard Standring believes the U.S. funds itself with loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
i think the only way to really send a message is through the banking and credit bureau systems. somehow.
but good luck trying to get the majority of americans to do anything.
Originally posted by DeadFlagBlues
Very little of the Federal Income tax goes towards anything except the interest of debt we "owe" to the federal reserve
Originally posted by warrenb
The fiscal year 2004 federal budget is about $2 trillion. The spending in percentages this year looks like this:
26.2%—military
22.6%—interest on the debt
19%—health care
5.5%—income security
3.4%—veterans’ benefits
3.3%—education
2.5%—nutrition spending
1.6%—housing
1.6%—environment
11.4%—everything else
Looking at it a different way, if you had $1,500 deducted from your paychecks as an “income” tax and your tax dollars were directly applied to government expenses, your contributions by category would be:
$393—military
$339—interest on national debt
$285—healthcare
$83—income security
$51—veterans’ benefits
$48—education
$38—nutrition spending
$24—housing
$24—environmental protection
$216—everything else
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Complete garbage, and for somebody who wanted to join the army where the heck do you think that $500 billion expenditure comes from? And what else exactly pays for roads? can you provide some evidence? Here let me list you the other taxes:
Retirement Taxes-are you retired?
Tariffs-are you importing any goods?
Tolls-how ofton do you go on 6hour drive? do you think this will be sufficient to pay your roads? Howmany tolls are in your state?
Inheritance Taxes- did you inherit millions?
In other words the only taxes your bound to are really income taxes, the rest apply seperately or together for a fraction of the population, this notion that fraction pays for the large demands of our nation is ignorant. Given our huge population, our large infastructure demands, are you really that naive to think without income taxes that fraction will pay for the rest of us? The entire myth about income taxes going to debt is outdated, seriously. I find it funny however that in the last 30years over 80% of our debt could be accounted for "fiscally conservative" anti-tax presidents.
[edit on 6-7-2009 by Southern Guardian]
Washington State County Engineers Article – Number 24 of a Series in 2004
File Name: Article 24-04 Who Pays.Doc
Page 1 of 2 July 4, 2004
Who pays for County Roads? The simple answer is “The User Does.” Let’s look at county road fund sources. From 1996 thru 2001, County Road Departments received about 11% from the federal government. 28% came from the state. Federal and state dollars are mostly fuel taxes. 61% came from county taxes. Most federal funds, 70%, come from the federal fuel tax. These dollars are for specific projects. The other 30% comes from the federal forest tax, and other miscellaneous grants. Federal funds can vary a lot from year to year. Nearly all state funds come from the state motor vehicle fuel tax. 63% is sent directly to each county. Additional state fuel tax funds are distributed for specific projects. They come through the County Road Administration Board at 17% and Transportation Improvement Board at 11%. The remaining 9% is from other state grants.
The amount collected from income tax greatly exceeds the amount spent on interest on the national debt every year. For example, in 2006, the individual income tax raised $1.04 trillion. The government’s net interest expense in 2006 was $226 billion. That’s about 20% of individual income tax revenues, not 100%.
Twenty percent of all income taxes is a lot of money. Interest on the national debt is a big amount and the national debt is a legitimate concern. But it’s not remotely true to say that all income taxes go to pay interest. Net interest is only about 1/5 of annual income tax revenue.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by DeadFlagBlues
Your buddy here just showed me how many things actually depended on income tax, including the military, defense, housing and schools. Essentially ending income tax will be cutting those services off. What more, you folks have never seen this system place... but yes its some conspiracy right? or maybe the majority of folks are smart enough to realize it doesnt work.
Essentially your talking with nothing to support it but "speculation". Lets cut off all these services above and all would be dandy.
Im done here, its really a dead end arguing with you folks. Hey, 2010 and 2012 is on the way, why dont you set up a party and see whether folks will agree.
With Only 1% of Individual Returns Being Audited and 16% of People Simply Not Paying Their Taxes, Will Even More People Stop Paying Too?
According to an IRS spokesperson in an article about anti-war tax resistance, 16.3% of Americans are in non-compliance with their taxes according to the Associated Press. That isn't fudging the numbers or coming up with creative tax deductions;
Around 1 in 6 Americans Do Not Pay Their Taxes
it's simply evading taxes outright. While the story about the anti-war movement calling on people to not pay taxes to protest the war is interesting, the fact that a growing number of Americans are simply evading taxes is startling.
As fewer and fewer people get prosecuted for tax evasion, more and more individuals will likely feel safe in either "embellishing" details to reduce their taxes or simply not pay them all together.
Business and non-business entities fund education primarily through tax payments to local and state governments. This analysis identifies the state and local tax revenues that provide education funding, and apportions that revenue between business and nonbusiness taxpayers.
The analysis of “Who Pays for Education?” indicates that non-business taxpayers pay nearly three quarters of the total education-bound tax dollars. Below the aggregate level the ratios vary, but in few cases do the business taxpayers contribute a greater portion than the non-business taxpayers. For example:
At the state level, business pays slightly more than a third of taxes; non-business payers contribute nearly two-thirds.
Local property tax is the greatest revenue source for education, providing nearly 40 percent of these funds. No other single tax source approaches that level of revenue production.
State and local taxes on income produce 22 percent of education-bound tax revenue.
Sales taxes provide more than 17 percent of tax revenue going to education.
State corporation taxes produce 10 percent of education-bound tax revenue.
The relationships described above can be used to provide some insight into a variety of existing proposals for school finance reform. For example, the property tax, the largest single revenue source for education, is the most frequent target of reform proposals.
Origin The roots of IRS go back to the Civil War when President Lincoln and Congress, in 1862, created the position of commissioner of Internal Revenue and enacted an income tax to pay war expenses. The income tax was repealed 10 years later. Congress revived the income tax in 1894, but the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional the following year.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by DeadFlagBlues
In other words the only taxes your bound to are really income taxes, the rest apply seperately or together for a fraction of the population, this notion that fraction pays for the large demands of our nation is ignorant.
Are you saying people have a choice not to be taxed by not purchasing items or driving?
Just like homeless make the choice to be hungry because they are lazy and need to take a shower.