It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to post by DASFEX
Yes, religion has deluded multitudes of people.
Jesus isn't about that. He gets damned, but He shouldn't.
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to post by DASFEX
By the way, if you can't tell I am a woman, may the Lord help you in your relationships with women.
How dumb is that? You think that a man would be so sensitive?
You think that a man would be so sensitive?
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by Imago Dei
reply to post by moocowman
...You can't just cross out the creator of the very universe chap. Your in for a very rud awakening, when you will go spiralling of into outer darkness like a spinning X for eterinity.
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Imago Dei]
Well it could be worse. I could end up in Heaven with all the XIANS.
So given that option... I'll take what's behind door #2. I hope it's RUD!
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Angus123]
When you say "Christian Theology", you assume that all Christians hold value or importance in the Trinity. The Trinity is just another detail of Christianity that not all Christians can agree upon. So while what you say may be true in his case, it also may not be.
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church describes the Trinity as "the central dogma of Christian theology"
In a literal sense, could you point me to the part of the Bible that says that Jesus created the universe? Regardless if Jesus was "there" in some sort of spiritual or non-physical way, it was God who created the universe, not Jesus.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men...
He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him...
There is a distinction, otherwise Jesus wouldn't be the son of God.
Watch this space... The pressure's building. He's gonna blow!
The big mistake is we haven't been fundamentalist ENOUGH! and need to remove all our kids from public schools enmasse and let geration x's generation next the children of the grave continue to learn all about transgenderism, contemporary gays sex lifestyles in, regular visits abd guest speakers from planned parenthood, while they coninue to sell methamphetamines and xtasy thinking we all came from the primordial slime and that life is just what we observe in nature and if ya see a monkey doin it in public, we know its ok for us to do too.
HAH HAH, Christian Britain, has never been alive. You pathetic anti -Christs still havent got a clue whats going on. You God haters and God mockers are on your stinking last legs, and I thank God for that.
They remove Christ from Christmas and made it Xmas,
y.
they're now removing Christ from Christianity and making it xianit
I don't have any relationships with woman, I have friendships with them and they are very guarded. I reserved the relationship for just one in particular. Yes I agree I can never get too much advice on understanding woman, they are an enigma. 2) If you had any idea how many guys pose as females online, you wil understand why when you say you are a female, I can only say "if you say so" I still wouldn't know but Ill take your word for it if it even matters.
The main reason for our lack of attendance is the economy, we simply cannot afford to go to the church of our choice.
For many it isn't so much their faith in Christianity that is failing but their faith in the church and its ability
Once a church starts deviating and allowing things that have always been taboo, it's only right that the people should turn away from it.
Originally posted by d60944
When you say "Christian Theology", you assume that all Christians hold value or importance in the Trinity. The Trinity is just another detail of Christianity that not all Christians can agree upon. So while what you say may be true in his case, it also may not be.
Now that's just a straw-man, showing your lack of understanding. Sure, you can find some people calling themselves Christians who won't believe in a Trinity. The mainstream says that Jesus is God, and therefore was not created at the incarnation, merely, well, incarnated then. There were fights over this in the first few centuries and the issue has been settled in the mainstream definitively. While all Christians may not agree on what precislely the Trinity means (and don't believe for a moment the words of anyone who claims to have actually fully understood it), it is a core belief nonetheless, even if not expressed with as much vigour as the RC church likes to.
en.wikipedia.org...
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church describes the Trinity as "the central dogma of Christian theology"
Straw man.
In a literal sense, could you point me to the part of the Bible that says that Jesus created the universe? Regardless if Jesus was "there" in some sort of spiritual or non-physical way, it was God who created the universe, not Jesus.
Well, given that Christianity says that Jesus IS God, and the he was present at creation, and that I have provided Biblical quotes that demonstrate this, the onus is rather on you to provide quotes from scripture that specifty that somehow the Son was NOT involved in the creation. As I recall, the creation stories (I hesitate to call them either accounts or myths), speak only of "God" (and refer to his Spirit - which seems to be a more poetic element than a meaningful reference to the NT Paraclete).
But given as you want me to point at things for you, the opening of the Gospel of John talks about all this for you - ref given in my previous post. I'm sure all this is all familiar to you:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men...
He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him...
There is a distinction, otherwise Jesus wouldn't be the son of God.
The Wiki article on the Trinity barely scratches the surface of the complexity. But this distintion between Jesus and God, as a real matter of substance, is a red herring:
The term "Son" is a term describing in some way the relationships between the elements of a single truine God. It is not a way to show their derivative nature from a single other source. "Son" does not mean son in the sense of the human progenetive relationship. We could discuss the meanings of the relationships within the Trinity for years - as indeed people have been doing (one of the extant distinctions between the RC and Eatern Orthodox churches is the Nicene Creed's "filioque" clause - and how this implies the progenitive nature of Father and Son, and what precisely this all means).... but in essence, a fundamental distincton of substance as a way to distinguish Jesus and "God" is not something you'll find in normal Christian belief. And it's also pretty irrelevant to this thread...... :-)
Caveat - again, this is not a post in defence of doctrine itself, but a post showing that your claims of internal contradictions are unfounded.
Originally posted by Imago Dei
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by Imago Dei
reply to post by moocowman
...You can't just cross out the creator of the very universe chap. Your in for a very rud awakening, when you will go spiralling of into outer darkness like a spinning X for eterinity.
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Imago Dei]
Well it could be worse. I could end up in Heaven with all the XIANS.
So given that option... I'll take what's behind door #2. I hope it's RUD!
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Angus123]
Good it wouldnt be heaven if you where there!
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by Imago Dei
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by Imago Dei
reply to post by moocowman
...You can't just cross out the creator of the very universe chap. Your in for a very rud awakening, when you will go spiralling of into outer darkness like a spinning X for eterinity.
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Imago Dei]
Well it could be worse. I could end up in Heaven with all the XIANS.
So given that option... I'll take what's behind door #2. I hope it's RUD!
[edit on 10-7-2009 by Angus123]
Good it wouldnt be heaven if you where there!
It is times like these I almost wish your Jesus was real so he could smack you upside the head for claiming to follow him but doing nothing of the sort.
Originally posted by Bunken Drum
So I came across this (not literally :lol which may shed some light on religion vs sex:So if a person becomes a religious leader after temporal lobe epilepsy leads to powerful religious visions, as the article speculates St Paul, amongst others, did, then we can expect that they were more stimulated by a table than sex, but that god trumped both.
Better than sex
The first clinical evidence to link the temporal lobes with religious sensations came from monitoring how TLE patients responded to sets of words. In an experiment where people were shown either neutral words (table), erotic words (sex) or religious words (god), the control group was most excited by the sexually loaded words. This was picked up as a sweat response on the skin. People with temporal lobe epilepsy did not share this apparent sense of priorities. For them, religious words generated the greatest reaction. Sexual words were less exciting than neutral ones.
God on the brain
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
I'd imagine that if someone just didn't get it, all that bed-squeaking, or, heaven forfend, table rattling & banging, moaning & grunting, laughing, yelling, squealing & screaming, would have become very annoying. All those people enjoying themselves in a way that made no sense to the afflicted... probably would make such a person jealous too.
Originally posted by moocowman
Well all looks a bit homosexual to me my friend, not that I have anything against gay people, I may well decide to try it myself one day who knows what the future can bring eh ?
Being a homosexual struggling against natural tendencies within a homophobic religion, would go a long way to explaining your hate toward anyone that would question your fragile faith.
Dude as far as I can see, Jesus didn't seem to have a problem with gay people it is Yahweh that will have them killed.
Why not do yourself a big favor, go outside and take a deep breath of fresh air, look to the sky and say Jesus I love you and I'm gay.
You will probably find a huge weight lifted off your shoulders and feel a lot less bitter toward women.
Remember son,
your mother didn't do this to you no one did anything to you, you are you. Go out there and be yourself, I guarantee you this, if Jesus is real and a decent bloke as claimed then he'll not love you any less.