It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are these really Michael Jackson's biological children???

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 30 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheLoony
I really, really don't give a flying fart through a donut hole.

Do we not have bigger things to worry about?

I didn't care about MJ last week, nor did I care about Farrah Fawcett, nor did I care about Billy Mayes.

Why the hell we have so much interest in these people is beyond me. Not one of these people did anything to help cure cancer, create world peace, anything. They are just people who have died, like all of us will, and there is no reason a thread about any of them should be on any website, period.

So many things a going on in this world, and here we are in the umpteenth thread about MJ. Why? Please, tell me a good reason we need this?

Lastly, his "music" sucked. Why he ever got as popular as he did is beyond me.



not only did his music sucked, its a lie



posted on Dec, 30 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by wingsfan
those kids had light hair, skin, and eyes. and yeah I know that tends to change as kids get older. but what always struck me odd, is when he died and they were spending more time with the jackson family, they got really dark, really fast. I wouldn't put it past them to put bleach cream on the boy.


You know what that is a good one, I never thought of that



new topics
 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join