posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:56 AM
Its a natural part of distinguishing who is a non active member or a member who has contributed to a topic with content relevant and worth
while to investigate.
I disagree.
All *active member* means is the person is posting - no reflection at all on the content of the posts which could be trash.
Just because someone posts more is no indication of relevancy or a *worth while* contribution - which in my opinion would make the creator of a
quality post much more an *active member* than someone who posts multiple times with little content.
Just one post, well thought out, well written, meaningful and relevant is worth more than ten thousand *blah blah blahs*.
As for the new system I don’t like it either, but, I’ve kept mum on it.
I’d like there to be an option hide this *ranking* - a *tic box* in the account set up that allows us to *hide* or *show* ranking in the
avatar.
In fact I’ve noticed some post without any ranking at all and wondered how I can get my avatar to *look like that*.
Added note:
Being the first response here i would like to inform you that no amount of digital information can represent you as an entity.
I’d like you to start a thread on this - if you do let me know and I will reply.
I don't agree.
I also don’t agree with people who say the computer life is not *real life*.
But I can’t and wont go into any more of that here as it would stray from the topic.
Flag for the OP!
peace
[edit on 25-5-2009 by silo13]