It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You think this is an opinion? You obviously failed to read the first post. Can you point out what is not scientific? Can you point out what is opinion?
The thread had an abundance of information and the third link was filled with even more information.
Sorry, you didn't read any of it. You fail.
Really! But calling Professor Jones work trash, is part of you discrediting the process from Bentham.
Show me where I stated it was trash. Where I said it was trash. You like Swing D. attempt to put words in my mouth. Sorry, wont work.
The few scientists I know of that have read the paper that was published say it is trash.
I am not happy how these people went about publishing Jones’ report and yes, I think it was underhanded to say the lease.
Great, we agree on this 100%. Write to Jones and ask him to have it resubmitted.
Jones' paper is (considered) 'false' because it is not correctly peer reviewed.
There is no peer reviewed paper that corraborates the entire offical story.
1archaic a: HISTORY 1 b: HISTORY 3
2 a: an account of incidents or events b: a statement regarding the facts pertinent to a situation in question c: ANECDOTE ; especially : an amusing one
3 a: a fictional narrative shorter than a novel ; specifically : SHORT STORY b: the intrigue or plot of a narrative or dramatic work
4: a widely circulated rumor
5: LIE, FALSEHOOD
6: LEGEND, ROMANCE
7: a news article or broadcast
8: MATTER, SITUATION
Originally posted by jprophet420
just for the record:
Jones' paper is (considered) 'false' because it is not correctly peer reviewed.
There is no peer reviewed paper that corraborates the entire offical story.
Therefore the official story is also false by your own standards.
Have a pleasant day.
Originally posted by jprophet420
name something forensic science cant explain and then relate to me what it has to do with september 11th please. I dont mean something forensic science cant explain if it doesent have evidence either.
The Bretham VANITY Journal is just that. PAY TO PUBLISH. If it doesn't get published, the journal does not get paid. Your Words Not Mine
Although vanity presses are a legitimate publishing option, the term “vanity press” has become derogatory, and is often used to imply that an author who self-publishes using such a service is only publishing out of vanity, and that his or her work could not be commercially successful, an assumption that is not true in all cases.
Scholarly journals often ask authors to pay page charges but use peer review to keep a high scientific standard. This is to be distinguished from the true vanity publisher, who will publish anything within their general market that will be paid for.