It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by jd140
While the terroists who carried out the 9/11 events flew into our country. There are those who we call 9/11 terroists who helped plan it. From what I have gathered, those are the ones who are being referred to.
Adnan Bukhari
Between 5:00 and 5:30 on the morning of September 12, FBI agents backed by a SWAT team stormed Bukhari's leased house at 4036 57th Terrace and arrested him - citing that identity cards of him and an Ameer Bukhari (mistakenly thought to be a brother) were found in a rental car the hijackers had left in Portland, Maine; though it later turned out that Ameer had died a year earlier, and had no relation to Adnan.
Agents evacuated nearby houses, citing concerns that Adnan Bukhari's house was rigged with explosives, and took him to Miami for questioning. While searching his house, they announced that they had found a copy of Ameer Bukhari's pilot license, and a "hazardous materials manual". After passing a polygraph, he was released and later cleared of any wrongdoing.
en.wikipedia.org...
posted by CameronFox
reply to post by SPreston
Atta's own father believes his son is dead... and is actually a terrorist sympathizer.
How did so much evidence initially point to the Bukharis, and how did Adnan Bukhari's name reportedly appear on Flight 11's manifest?
The words "fabricated evidence" spring to mind.
The Bukharis innocence caused a major rethink of Flight 11's hijackers, and this rethink resulted in the implausible scenario of Atta abandoning two rental cars in two airports.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mohamed Atta spoke excellent German - good enough to correct other students' texts - as well as fluent English and Arabic.
Atta and two other suspected hijackers reported their passports stolen in late 1999.
[Rudi Dekkers, owner of Huffman Aviation] knew that Atta had lived in Hamburg, Germany and one day [in 2000] spoke to him in German as a way of friendly communication. Atta was stunned and quickly walked away.
An imposter could pretend to be Atta, but he couldn't pretend to speak German.
[Atta senior] had no knowledge his son had ever been in the United States. More absurd to him was the idea that his son had enrolled in a Florida flight school. “Did he ever learn to fly? Never. He never even had a kite.” Added Atta senior: “My daughter, who is a doctor, used to get him medicine before every journey, to make combat the cramps and the vomiting he feels every time he gets on the plane.”
whatreallyhappened.com...
The father of Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the September 11 attacks, said in an interview published yesterday that his son was still alive.
"He is hiding in a secret place so as not to be murdered by the US secret services," Mohammed el-Amir Atta, 66, told the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag. He also vehemently denied that his son - believed to have flown the first plane into the World Trade Centre - had taken part in the atrocities, blaming them instead on "American Christians".
The interview painted a picture of a tortured man who has not come to terms with his 33-year-old son's death or with the huge crime laid at his door. He said he feared the US would try to poison him.
Speaking from his Cairo home, Mr Atta described hearing about the attacks after returning from a holiday on the Red Sea on the evening of September 12. "My daughter called and said she was going to drop in. She stood at the door and said 'turn on the TV'," he said. Amid images of the jets crashing into the Twin Towers, he saw his son's passport photograph.
"As I saw the picture of my son," he said, "I knew that he hadn't done it. My son called me the day after the attacks on September 12 at around midday. We spoke for two minutes about this and that.
"He didn't tell me where he was calling from. At that time neither of us knew anything about the attacks."
Mr Atta said he did not condone the attacks, but could understand the hijackers' motivation. "Every day our Palestinian brothers are being murdered, their houses destroyed. If their relatives were to fly a plane into the Empire State Building I couldn't hold it against them," he added.
Mr Atta called his son a "gentle and tender boy", who enjoyed reading history and geography books and was nicknamed "Bolbol", or nightingale, by his parents.
www.guardian.co.uk...
The Magic Passport allegedly found on Vessey St below, even though officially the aircraft poor Satam Al Suqami was allegedly trapped inside, hit the northeast tower wall almost dead center and was absorbed almost completely by the massive core structure. So how did the passport supposedly inside his pocket escape the exploding burning sealed fuselage; unless he was holding it out the open cockpit before the impact? Of course it was just another piece of planted evidence, wasn't it?
Originally posted by purehughness
reply to post by SPreston
The Magic Passport allegedly found on Vessey St below, even though officially the aircraft poor Satam Al Suqami was allegedly trapped inside, hit the northeast tower wall almost dead center and was absorbed almost completely by the massive core structure. So how did the passport supposedly inside his pocket escape the exploding burning sealed fuselage; unless he was holding it out the open cockpit before the impact? Of course it was just another piece of planted evidence, wasn't it?
Great post SPreston!
It's claims like this 'magic' passport that really bring it home to me that the majority of people will believe just about anything just because the MSM says so. When will people get the guts to question things and not accept them as gospel?
Pffft! Yeah right, this passport survived intact after going through a fireball of burning fuel....My behind! Funny that this passport forms the basis of so many people's delusions about the whole 9/11 affair. OOOH there's an arab on there! Let's send thousands of troops over there to rape their countries...
Poor Show.
posted by Grimstad
reply to post by SPreston
First of all, there is nothing “structural” about the wall. It’s mostly glass and the metal that is there may not even be steel. Its cosmetic. It’s not supporting the building. The outside of the building hangs on a steel skeleton. There is absolutely no supporting elements visible in those pictures.
C.S.I. 9/11 by Josef Princiotta