These camps have black helicopters flying around, dogs barking, and military trucks everywhere. The military admits they have them and there are lists
of them. There are forced labor camps in operation right now with inmates. The U.S. has more prisoners than any other country.
Furthermore, the road signs are all marked with reflectors and embedded signs to lead the military to pick up and drop off points. Besides the camps
built to hold us, the government has also designated places in every town to hold the people until they can be moved. It didn't take them long in New
Orleans to find a way to confiscate people's firearms, to round people up and hold them at gunpoint.
This is a very good link that explains tacmars in a nutshell.
thespacelady.blogspot.com...
www.nepawearechange.org...
web.archive.org...://www.tackamarks.freeservers.com/
As to the pictures people demand, we can only do so much here on ATS beyond putting up links. We also have the fact that during Katrina we saw what
FEMA did and how quickly they can round people up and detain them. Those people were hauled off to camps all over the country, families split up. We
watched it on TV for an entire week.
Here's a good website with lists of camps, where they are in each state.
www.apfn.org...
San Francisco Chronicle
Rule by fear or rule by law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg
Monday, February 4, 2008
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment
of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943
Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest
a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency
influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs."
Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to
build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands
of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.
According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the
removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."
Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go to
taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention
facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps millions of people?
Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the
power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural
disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the
extent that state officials cannot maintain public order."
The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment of
anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies.
The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike.
Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of government" in the
event of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency." Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he
alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure "continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling elections to
suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.
U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955), which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a
commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative
recommendations on combatting it.
According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a native brand
of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping investigative power to combat it.
A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in sit-ins,
civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion
protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists, peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list goes on
and on. According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number
increasing by 20,000 per month.
What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens?
The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use the
war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.
Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.
This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle
www.sfgate.com.../c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL
==================================================
U.S. APPROVES USE OF MILITARY AGAINST CITIZENS
web.archive.org...://www.thewinds.org/1997/02/military_role.html
FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS: Locations and Executive Orders
www.apfn.org...
Compound / Range 3
This is the site with the latest info & pictures concerning the "Camp Grayling Range 3 area" speculated by some to be a citizen detention camp
located on a Michigan military reservation.
Surely, this is a very real place...But, what is this place exactly, and does it serve as a sinister holding area for future government dissidents
through Rex '84, Operation Garden Plot, & FEMA programs?
Decide for yourself...
www.geocities.com...
Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft's Hellish Vision
Wed Aug 14 20:09:38 2002
68.98.68.169
Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft's Hellish Vision
Attorney general shows himself as a menace to liberty.
By Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley is a professor of constitutional law at
George Washington University.
www.truthout.org...
Los Angeles Times
Wednesday, 14 August, 2002
Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he
deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political
embarrassment to being a constitutional menace.