It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
Well any way it is spun I find it interesting how masons often times are apparently either disinformed or not in agreement as to which masonic secret societies actually exist and which ones do not. Isn't there a manual for this?
Actually it shows that there's no power structure to masonry, because what's true for my lodge in my state in my country may be entirely different than someone else's somewhere else. Hard for that to be terribly useful for conspiratorial purposes, if you ask me, because half of the groups don't recognize each other for one reason or another.
Anyhow it just goes to show the obvious power structure of masonry and all other groups alike. Hence it is on a need to know basis and there are many who apparently don't need to know.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
I think your analogies are overly general and not very good at supporting your arguement.
A police officer is a police officer no matter where they are.
A priest is a priest no matter where they are.
A mason is a mason no matter where he/she is.
These people might not be openly performing their duties in whatever title they carry at all times but they are still under the title.
Because you ATS mason trolls
say its not 'rite' doesn't make all these women, who have obviously taken an oath of honesty and truthfulness like you lot, liars.
That is what you are saying here and you should be ashamed for labeling a group of women that stand for ideals that you say you stand for as liars and fabricators.
I think the shoe is on the other foot gentlemen. I use that loosely to those with this thinking.
Well its time to wake up guys. We see through your games and its getting extremely boring.
These people might not be openly performing their duties in whatever title they carry at all times but they are still under the title.
A mason is a mason no matter where he/she is.
They did not take the same oaths as we did, as ours specifiaclly precludes, among other things, women.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
These people might not be openly performing their duties in whatever title they carry at all times but they are still under the title.
You forgot to read the above there Augustus. My father knew a lot of priests and most of them didn't wear anything to indicate they were priests. But when someone would find out they would become the way they would normally be with a man of the clergy. Whatever that feeling or way of acting may be, when you generally find out at the onset of meeting someone that they are a priest then you would be acting according this whether he has the neck piece of not. The Human psyche..
As to the police officer. Imagine that a police officer in Washington goes on a trip to California and doesn't wear his uniform. Now while he is in a bank and just leaves he notices that someone is holding up the bank and that only one CA police officer is there and the crooks are coming out. He identifies himself to the CA police officer with ID and then the CA police officer deputizes him to allow him to assist with the crooks. The CA police can also deputize an ORDINARY citizen to do the same thing.
An American is just that an American. You can't just come out and say 'I don't want to be an American' and then your NOT an American. Not that easy...
A mason is a mason no matter where he/she is.
No matter what lodge your with, be it Scottish, Blue, Purple, Scarlet, Amazing or whatever, you are recognized as a mason. This should be quite evident by the amount of masons within the global hierarchy that flash each other symbols and shake each others hands using the masonic handshake.
Even leaving this out of the equation for lack of something to have jumped on, a mason is a mason away from home and doesn't shed the coat just because he's away from the temple. If a US mason is on vacation to the UK and has friends there that are masons, would you not be accepted at their lodge during an appropriate group get together? I think you may be invited because of your 'masonic' links to a lodge.
So, as to your statement of me being very generalized.... I think not, you must think out of the box and not as a mason. Thinking like a mason can lead to logic not making much sense.
I understand that you didn't take the same oath and that makes sense. But does that mean they didn't take an oath of trust and honesty with Freemasonry?
3. These women that have taken an oath of freemasonry within the US and abroad perform in the same manner as your lodge does I bet.
So, now the questions...
If the women are not masons because they swore an oath that is somehow not recognized by other masons, does that mean they're not masons?
If it does, then in scenario one, the first level mason isn't a mason because he swears another oath than the higher levels. Hell, the lowlevelmason could even say the higher one aren't truly mason because they state a different oath.
How about scenario two. If your from the Blue lodge and meet a Scottish lodge member is he not a mason because he made a different oath?
Doesn't appear to be the way with our diplomatic officials who do the mason handshakes... acknowledging their duty to Freemasonry..
How about scenario three. If these women are presented to your lodge from out of country and they are with a group of male masons, would you not pay them the same courtesy or would you cast them out because YOUR lodge and oaths state something different than the others? Would you laugh at them and call them liars for calling themselves masons like all you masons do?
So, in summary I believe I've shown that those are not generalities and lead to understanding that just because you take off a uniform or some other identifying feature doesn't mean that you can turn it off.
It also means you can benefit from making it known of your position. This benefit from being a mason is a good example of what is known as treason. But because they are a brotherhood that can cross all lines, even battle lines and show this brotherhood.
Yet they cannot even acknowledge that these women are their equals within the freemasonry cult and should be shown the same respect shown there so-called brothers.
This isn't pot stirring mister mason,
I'm merely responding in reference to the OP which states that there are women masons.
Many mason have stated in SOME way that they are not masons... Because of the Blue this or Scottish that...
when I'm telling everyone it doesn't matter about what 'rite' they belong they are 'wrong' and are masons.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
1. Your oaths etc are different within your own lodge by degrees. Meaning masons level 1-3 would take one oath and levels 4 and above take others oaths. I could be wrong it could be 1-2 and 3 up.... You get the idea though... so within your own lodge or temple you have different oaths depending on the members level. I got this from a High Level mason post... I'll try to find it....
2. The oath that is made in the Blue lodge is different than the one that is given in a Scottish lodge. They would use different words etc...
If the women are not masons because they swore an oath that is somehow not recognized by other masons, does that mean they're not masons? If it does, then in scenario one, the first level mason isn't a mason because he swears another oath than the higher levels. Hell, the lowlevelmason could even say the higher one aren't truly mason because they state a different oath.
How about scenario two. If your from the Blue lodge and meet a Scottish lodge member is he not a mason because he made a different oath? Doesn't appear to be the way with our diplomatic officials who do the mason handshakes... acknowledging their duty to Freemasonry.
How about scenario three. If these women are presented to your lodge from out of country and they are with a group of male masons, would you not pay them the same courtesy or would you cast them out because YOUR lodge and oaths state something different than the others? Would you laugh at them and call them liars for calling themselves masons like all you masons do?
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
I mean both of the masons above have agreed that to what I'd stated.
That they would use some type of disagreement between the blue lodge and orange lodge and the scottish lodge etc to make all the info I've included buried.
Just another thing to make those reading this thread not want to.
As to the handshake being ceremonial... you have a ceremony everytime you meet your fellow masons?
I realize that is one reason for the handshake, which is evident in the handshake that Reagan gave to Russian President during one of his accord signings here. So, I believe you there mister mason, that is true that they use for ceremonial occasions.
Originally posted by telepathicjon
reply to post by RuneSpider
The only connection I have with these people is they know that I am spreading telepathic awareness and they were trying to get me away from doing that. E
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
reply to post by Jkd Up
Just another thing to make those reading this thread not want to.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
A mason is a mason no matter where he/she is.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
Because you ATS mason trolls say its not 'rite' doesn't make all these women, who have obviously taken an oath of honesty and truthfulness like you lot, liars.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
Well its time to wake up guys. We see through your games and its getting extremely boring.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
No matter what lodge your with, be it Scottish, Blue, Purple, Scarlet, Amazing or whatever, you are recognized as a mason.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
If a US mason is on vacation to the UK and has friends there that are masons, would you not be accepted at their lodge during an appropriate group get together? I think you may be invited because of your 'masonic' links to a lodge.
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
If the women are not masons because they swore an oath that is somehow not recognized by other masons, does that mean they're not masons?
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
Scenarios 1 and 2
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
How about scenario three.