It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by Learhoag
Since you and all of the other ATS "geniuses" know everything, there is nothing left to say since it would fall on deaf and dumb ears.
LearHoag,
More personal attacks & insults? Classy!
But it doesn't prove the existence of Rods!
Why don't you bring a scientific argument that verifies your claims to the table instead? You do have one - don't you? All this amazing information you say you have can be shared in this thread too. Why only by email?
Surely if it's that great, it will turn us all into ROD believers. That is your goal isn't it? To prove they are real? So do it mate! Surprise us!
IRM
[edit on 12/3/09 by InfaRedMan]
Originally posted by Learhoag
Sorry, mate, not worth the effort.
Originally posted by Learhoag
Since you and all of the other ATS "geniuses" know everything, there is nothing left to say since it would fall on deaf and dumb ears.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Learhoag
Your post is proof positive that you know nothing about Rods. Just the BS/fantasy stuff. It's a shame when people can't accept the truth that Rods have a prosaic answer. This has been demonstrated time and time again on this website and many others.
Rods are little bugs flying close to the camera and no matter how much you wish they were something more fantastic and exotic, it isn't going to change what they truly are.
Instead of asking people to contact you privately, discuss it here in the open forum where your 'information' can be honestly scrutinized. If you truly believe in your theory then it should hold up to the scrutiny and prove us all wrong.
If you don't wish to share you 'evidence' in the open forum, then this means that you either know your theories are baseless fodder, or your intentions are to mislead people.
All your doing is spreading ignorance and disinformation mate! Try showing some intellectual honesty and integrity instead. Post your stuff here!
IRM
[edit on 11/3/09 by InfaRedMan]
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Well post a link to THESE great videos you claim to have I mean if you really are so confident in what they show POST LINKS prove us wrong.
Lets wait and see what happen I think nothing will!
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Well post a link to THESE great videos you claim to have I mean if you really are so confident in what they show POST LINKS prove us wrong.
Lets wait and see what happen I think nothing will!
Here's the thing wmd_2008,
If someone is only going to post their evidence to a cherry picked audience whom they know is going to blindly support their data and pat them on the back, it can hardly be called a search for the truth.
It provides a safe harbor where ignorance can be successfully denied and fairy tales can rule supreme. Evidence that cannot be tested/scrutinized via peer review is nothing but hot air and hear-say.
I'm waiting for Learhoag to come clean too. We've certainly done our part. I'm starting to think this undeniable, thoroughly researched evidence he claims to be in possession of doesn't exist.
IRM
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Learhoag
Learhoag,
How about this then... We have supplied evidence in the open forum on why we feel Rods are just bugs. It's open to your scrutiny too you know! Can you show us why the evidence we've supplied is wrong?
Instead of attacking us, you could have attacked the data with all that you claim to know. That's the great thing about this forum. People's minds can be changed if the evidence is compelling enough.
Don't give in because it's a tough audience. The evidence will speak for itself... no?
IRM [/quote
Originally posted by Learhoag
First: I am in total agreement that rods are sorta "bugs" although I prefer
"insect." No one know what they are but they are living things. Aerial insects. Not connected to UFOs or aliens. Earth creatures as of yet not discovered by mainstream science. Cryptozoology.
From that moment on I watched TV paying attention to the background instead of the foreground. I saw plenty of rods. Then I decided to record repeating programs in which I saw rods. Some rods were just inches long and some were, as claimed in some documentaries, hundreds of feet long.