Important consideration: To Jab or Not To Jab? That is the question...

It is clear from the many threads on this forum and popular alternative media representatives (Alex Jones) that the flu jab (avian or otherwise) is being seen as something that will help deliver the virus to the people.

However there are several important concerns with this theory that everyone should consider.

What if this idea of not taking vaccines is actually double think and reverse pscychology?

I mean, if the NWO were going to kill off people en-masse then wouldn't it be better (for them) that when the pandemic flu virus does arrive through airborne infection then people will WILLFULLY refuse the so called vaccine?

That would mean NWO would need less real vaccines and would help distinguish people who believe in alternative media and those that don't (and are therefore suitable to carry on living).

As a result, thsoe people who believed in the alternative media would REFUSE the vaccine thinking that it is actually going to cause the virus to spread. If the NWO do infact distribute the actual real vaccine then those that thought the vaccine was a scam and didn't take it - well those are people on the red list and meet an unfortunate end. This is the first WIN for the NWO.

The second WIN is that those that 'believed' in the system and their 'master's would trust in the vaccine and actually be cured! These people would be seen as 'fit' to continue.

As several threads seem to suggest there were no vaccines in 1918 (spanish flu outbreak) so such threads might be contributing to this double think, reverse psychology scam.

Yes, there were so called vaccines in the past that did in fact to more harm than good. But the intention of this vaccine is to use will of followers of alternative media to willfully refuse something that may actually help them.

This is all WIN WIN for NWO and Fail for those that strive for betterment of mankind.


Your comments

P.S. From the NWO perspective It would be easier and MORE efficient to release the virus en-masse and vaccinate people you want to save rather than infect people through vaccine - that just doesn't make any sense to me. An airborne release and contamination is really easy and the spread is almost uncontrollable. You don't need to physcially inject people to start this off!

[edit on 8-3-2009 by Djinnibaba]

For whatever this is worth, maybe nut'n, I myself have not recieved a flu shot in years. I have not been sick with flu since 2004. And my living conditions are -not- cloistered ( own house on spacious land) (UNHAPPILY!)

WOW!

Really interesting theory.

S&F.

You certainly do seem to have a point in your 'efficiency' and 'filtration' argument!

Originally posted by simonecharisse
For whatever this is worth, maybe nut'n, I myself have not recieved a flu shot in years. I have not been sick with flu since 2004. And my living conditions are -not- cloistered ( own house on spacious land) (UNHAPPILY!)

I'm really not sure about the current flu jabs out there. My focus is on the vaccine developed by the NWO to combat a mass killer flu like the human-avian flu version. Ref: Baxter and Avian-Human Flu

Originally posted by Djinnibaba

I mean, if the NWO were going to kill off people en-masse then wouldn't it be better (for them) that when the pandemic flu virus does arrive through airborne infection then people will WILLFULLY refuse the so called vaccine?
for the NWO.

How about people that no longer have insurance, and can't afford to pay for these vaccines?

If you were unemployed, and didn't have insurance, but had a family to take care of, would you buy groceries, or spring for a vaccine?

What a scary thought you present, because not onlywould they be able to get rid of the people who refuse the shot, but non contributing eaters at the same time!

Originally posted by Blanca Rose

Originally posted by Djinnibaba

I mean, if the NWO were going to kill off people en-masse then wouldn't it be better (for them) that when the pandemic flu virus does arrive through airborne infection then people will WILLFULLY refuse the so called vaccine?
for the NWO.

How about people that no longer have insurance, and can't afford to pay for these vaccines?

If you were unemployed, and didn't have insurance, but had a family to take care of, would you buy groceries, or spring for a vaccine?

What a scary thought you present, because not onlywould they be able to get rid of the people who refuse the shot, but non contributing eaters at the same time!

Yes, you certainly add a valid reason behind the acquisition of the vaccine.

Strictly speaking, the Government must provide the vaccine free of charge because that is why the taxes have been provided (national security and others).

However, when they do release such a disease everything including rights will be blown away.

So, vaccines might be given to those that are known to support the system and those that cn afford to buy it. Everyone else.. well... you know...

This issue is one of the most ground breaking, important news for entire humanity but it seems little importance is given to it (even on this forums).