It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
Just because noone agrees with your outlandish concepts or has any interest in them does NOT MEAN the subjects are off limits on ATS.
It means NOBODY cares, agrees or is interested. The fact you site a wannabe HOAXER as someone you "wish was here for you" tells all...
Bleh.
m...
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
What's the deal. There are some subjects that seem just a wee bit too hot to be discussed here. ATS is really starting to show its true colors.
Whatever you do.. don't mention FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds and Asscroft invoking the rarely used States Secrets Privelege
Don't discuss 9-11 cellphone use
and then there was that popular guy WITD....
Where's he when you need him?
Originally posted by EastCoastKid[/i
Valhall, I expected you to show up. You are so in my hand, baby.
Originally posted by mOjOm
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
9-11 cell phones I can't see being a problem. What are you talking about as your case in point? I've read posts in the distant past about them and many other aspects of 911.
Here's a study that was done. It's very interesting.
'Project Achilles' - Final Report and Summary of Findings
by A. K. Dewdney - 19th April 2003
During the early months of the year 2003, the author conducted three experiments to determine whether and how well cellphones could be operated from aircraft. The first flight (Part One) was essentially a probe of the experimental situation, to acquire some primary data and to work out a simple, readily implemented protocol. The results of Part Two (Diamond Katana 4-seater) have already appeared in these pages. The results of Part Three (Cessna 172-R) appear immediately below.
Since this completes the suite of experiments, it is appropriate to summarize the findings and to draw some conclusions. The conclusions are based partly on the experiments and partly on two other sources. (See Appendix B at the end of the report.) Expert opinion and eyewitness testimony are acceptable not only in court, but in certain scientific inquiries where events are of short duration or experiments are too expensive or impossible to carry out. Of course, eyewitness accounts do not carry the same weight as expert opinions or actual experiments, but the eyewitness accounts quoted below seem to be both consistent and compelling.
Disclaimer: The companies hired to assist in this experiment, namely Empire Aviation and Cellular Solutions, both of London, Ontario, Canada, acted as disinterested commercial parties, with no stake in the outcome or even knowledge of the purpose of the tests.
www.the7thfire.com...
Originally posted by Kano
You know it was a turn of phrase, there are indeed a ton of threads already on the subject though. As you would know had you bothered to search.
You made one yourself 4 days ago, why start another one today? If you are upset that more people aren't agreeing with you thats your problem. It does not give you the right to spam the board with reposts of old threads.