It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Oh really?
Then why are people seeing this thing all over?
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Off_the_street, you have been talking about something that has been discussed by memebers before.
"...why is the United States wasting billions of dollars on "obsolete" designs like the F-22, F/A35, F/A-18E/F, and so on?"
That was your question, and to give you a simple answer, is this, America is spending so much money on obsolete designs as those because if America spent so much money on the new designs, then The U.S. would be bankrupt. We spend money on those designs because right now, that is all the R&D budget allows for.
So you need to think about it ok? And I have done some extensive research on what the TR-3A is believed to accomplish, or atleast believed what it is to be.
For me, I have only know about the TR-3A, and was unaware about the TR-3B until a few months back, and yes I do believe that the TR-3B is a little bit farfetched.
So to agree with you, yes I do believe that the TR-3B does not exist, but to answer your question, there are a few reasons why America is still using those obsolete models, and I have just named one.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by newcovenant
No one knows that it looks like a TR3 because no one actually know what a TR3 looks like because no one has actually shown that the TR3 actually exists! Ditto wit how it flies.
.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by newcovenant
I've seen quite a few odd things in the sky.
I've seen several alleged "black" projects that can potentially account for some of the things that I have seen (along with other explanations that I was seeing some undocumented natural phenomena or having a brief 'glitch' in my visual senses).
To take the leap and say: "What I saw was an F-23. Not an F-22 or recon drone - an F-23 that must be part of some special warfare group..." is just simply not in me.
I've studied aircraft just about as long as I've been alive. It's one of my life's passions.
You may be fully convinced of what you saw. I can almost guarantee you that, were I there, I would be able to pull up an existing aircraft that matches what we saw while demonstrating its behavior to be well within the expected flight characteristics of that aircraft.
Alien spacecraft are far more plausible than a secret squadron of these aircraft that are allowed to fly absolutely reckless and haphazard patterns (based on witness sightings alleging this aircraft is their source).
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Nobody in the aviation community takes the TR3B story seriously because id does not exist.
The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program and the preceding Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project worked to develop a nuclear propulsion system for aircraft. The United States Army Air Force initiated Project NEPA on May 28, 1946.[1] After funding of $10 million in 1947,[2] NEPA operated until May 1951, when the project was transferred to the joint Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)/USAF ANP.[3] The USAF pursued two different systems for nuclear powered jet engines, the Direct Air Cycle concept which was developed by General Electric, and Indirect Air Cycle which was assigned to Pratt & Whitney. The program was intended to develop and test the Convair X-6, but was cancelled in 1961 before that aircraft was built.
Originally posted by newcovenant
I'm gathering you sort of resent not seeing one yourself for adequate convincing and so vigorously attempt to discredit others.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by newcovenant
I'm gathering you sort of resent not seeing one yourself for adequate convincing and so vigorously attempt to discredit others.
Ahh.....presumptuous AND ignorant - the ATS paradigm!
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by newcovenant
It's a deal - when you stop presuming you know what I want I shall stop thinking you presumptuous.
and when you stop ignoring the quality of the evidence I shall stop thinking you ignorant.
Yup. I am sure you can just as I did. And there is no "may be" about it. True... No I didn't get the serial number and mfg off the side of the thing but I can tell you it was a solid flat black triangle with a faint grey border and 3 small running lights floating just over the trees at a leisurely clip of about 10 miles an hour at quarter to 5 am.
Since I live near Grumman AFB and they reportedly make these things I suspected that it was one of those.
At first I thought it was ET but then I saw a depiction of the TR3B. No I have not studied these things and I have never seen a UFO but when you are around 3 they give you a game where you match up the shapes to the hole. I was always good at that game. lol I know what I saw and then I saw it depicted in pictures. It was not a hobby craft - was the Astra of some brand, shape or form.
I am sure you would have to have extremely high clearance to be fully aware of everything going on in defense don't you think?
I foudn this to be very interesting: