A problem with classification on ATS, page 1

First of all I would like to say that I feel pretty good about the fact that an internet site such as ATS exists. A nitch that people can fit into.

However I would like to point out that I am one that has felt the affliction of what is referred to as disinformation specialists. This has sharpened me in the area of trying to deal with potential threats, "before" they occur..

As a result of the comfort that some of the members havE bestowed upon me, I decided to share some empowering technological items with the ATS family.

I went to the trouble of making an animated video of what I consider to be the most efficient gyroscopic propulsion design possible; offering, "massive" lift as opposed to other designs.

The problem?
When I went to put this video on the ATS site, the only option I was I was given as a catagory for my device was, "Technology and Weapondry"..

This presents a problem to me in that any body agreeing with this, "option" is allready signing off on the, "threat" that this device can be considered something that needs to be opressed.

I feel offended that this is the case; and I would like to ask the ATS moderators openly to separate these two catagories so that would be empowering technologies are not signed off on as possibnly being a threat..

[edit on 18-2-2009 by noconsequence]