It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
He said: "Removing bad memories is not like removing a wart or a mole. It will change our personal identity since who we are is linked to our memories. It may perhaps be beneficial in some cases, but before eradicating memories, we must reflect on the knock-on effects that this will have on individuals, society and our sense of humanity."
John Harris, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Manchester, said: "It is obviously up to the individual whether or not she wishes to risk the possible effects, including psychological discontinuity, of erasing unpleasant memories.
"An interesting complexity is the possibility that victims, say of violence, might wish to erase the painful memory and with it their ability to give evidence against assailants.
"Similarly, criminals and witnesses to crime may, under the guise of erasing a painful memory (perhaps of another sort), render themselves unable (with a good excuse for being unable) to give evidence."
Originally posted by theRiverGoddess
it all sounds VERY............Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
Dont'cha think?
Originally posted by Mike_A
If I've read the news stories correctly this wouldn't erase a memory but suppress the fearful reaction to it. So for example if someone was in a crash and had PTSD, after taking this drug they would still remember the crash but it wouldn't come with the associated feelings of fear.
"Similarly, criminals and witnesses to crime may, under the guise of erasing a painful memory (perhaps of another sort), render themselves unable (with a good excuse for being unable) to give evidence."
Study leader Dr Merel Kindt explained that although the memories are still intact, the emotional intensity of the memory is dampened.
Originally posted by Mike_A
Study leader Dr Merel Kindt explained that although the memories are still intact, the emotional intensity of the memory is dampened.
news.bbc.co.uk...
This is what I've read in from other sources and in TV interviews.
It may be that the expert who was asked for his opinion didn't have time to be fully acquainted with the tests.
But anyway, the people who did the test claim the memory is still intact.