It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
reply to post by atrofi
I bet you would love for me to say yes wouldn't you? So you can shake your head down at me from all the way up there on your pedestal. Oh I sometimes forget that people like to be "progressive" in the face of the fact that this is obviously a joke and turn it into something political.
No, look at the picture where the girl is sleeping. It's hard to miss because it's the first one. A sleeping disabled girl offering sex.......
Who said it had anything to do with the way she looked? Or are you trying to put words in my mouth? I look forward to you're predictable reply...
[edit on 27-1-2009 by dodgygeeza]
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
reply to post by atrofi
Really, think about it for a few seconds.
The very fact that her disability is in the title is part of the selling points. She is drawing attention to the fact that she is in fact disabled as her main characteristic. Nothing is mentioned, except for condoms are not a requirement. In other words she might have just as well said "hey perverts, pay for sex with a tragically disabled girl and NO CONDOMS!!!!!"
Don't you think it is kind of disrespectful? When I say "disgusting" I don't mean she is disgusting, only how screwed up it is. Talk about no dignity! Don't disabled people want to be treated like everyone else?
Regardless of the fact that she is disabled, its a bloody sick shambles this world is becoming.
"hey perverts, pay for sex with a tragically disabled girl and NO CONDOMS!!!!!"
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
reply to post by atrofi
Thank you for your reasonable response.
I should have worded it better the first time round (I wasn't in a very diplomatic mood yesterday and I apologise for that) Anyway, I mean no offence by anything that I have said, only that the advert is sickening for the above mentioned reasons, not because she is disabled, but for the reasons that you said yourself.
And when I say "tragically" I only meant it in the context of the advert. Some of the pictures were just awful. There was even a picture of her breasts, quite clearly not taken by herself.
[edit on 28-1-2009 by dodgygeeza]
Originally posted by xbranscombex
Is this illegal and or wrong?? Unless in Nevada??