It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
The president does in fact hold the highest level of security clearance in the land.
Originally posted by whatukno
The problem is if our highest elected official is denied access to classified material, it weakens our national security. A sitting president has got to have access to all available information in order to create policy that is in line with the facts of the situation. If the president is denied critical knowledge of an issue because of security clearance they may make a grave mistake in the commander in chief role.
Originally posted by whatukno
Bottom line is, if he is allowed access to our nuclear arsenal, given the codes for launch. What could possibly be denied him? And if he is indeed denied access to information in this area, what other area's of information are denied him? Who if not our commander in chief is worthy of this sensitive information?
Originally posted by whatukno
Thank you for clarifying your statement.
Originally posted by whatukno
The last administration greatly expanded the powers of the presidency, it would be wise for the current administration to take the initiative of these newly garnered powers to perhaps promote a new era of disclosure. But if it is true that even our president is denied access to any sensitive information for whatever reason. It could make the case that disclosure in this area might not be forthcoming because of national security concerns. Which in my opinion itself reveals a lack of national security.
This also says something else, that the President isn't chosen by election or the electoral college, but someone else chooses the president, and how long he will be in office. It would be impossible to know that you were a "temp" president. If Carter knew he was only going to be in office for 4 years and they weren't going to show him everything because he was a "temp" what does that say about our democracy?
Originally posted by Crakeur
I know it was just a movie but, if you will recall, there was a similar situation in the movie Independence Day. The president had no clue about area 51 and the aliens being held there. I would imagine this is pretty much the case within our government. Some things the president cannot know, some things he should not know.
Yes, we need to be able to trust but that trust must be placed where it is earned and belongs. After so many decades of this corruptive behavior in our highest and most critical places, this behavior is becoming an accepted norm taken for granted in our social context like walking and the sun coming up every day. As truth in our endeavors slips away from us collectively and we embrace ignorance and a preference for the shallow and mundane, it is destructive and it will lead to ruin for all including those addicted to power, control and secrecy. However, their addiction will not allow them to see this.
If we want a true republic that is for the good of all and future generations, then we must fight for it or loose it. Right now there are truths of no doubt great importance regarding our greater planetary environment that are being denied us even though those truths are our property and ours by right of law and Constitution. Right now some smaller part of our population focused mostly on self and regarding us a merely cattle and a financial and talent resource is gaining control of us and positioning themselves as intermediaries between us and any greater environment. In their addiction, no amount of power and control will ever be enough and so we will all increasingly become prisoners of their addiction to the ruin of all.
Think about it. If there are others out there who may wish to make contact with us or at least be resigned to that as inevitable, who do you think they will wish to make contact with? Would it be with a few holding billions in a prison of ignorance or directly with those billions free to collectively decide on their destiny? Put yourself in the other fellow's shoes. If you were an alien, who would you place more confidence in on our end, the will of the few or the will of the many? Conversely, if some few here addicted to power are making contact with aliens, what kind of aliens would bother with such contact and who do you think is likely to get the favorable outcome?
You've seen in the Mars imaging that truth is in short supply and comes only when a mistake in obfuscation is made and, when it comes, it is usually the exact opposite of the official position. You've seen that it is the same with the Moon imaging. Now you can see representative samples of the same thing even in Earth imaging. It is a clue to connect the dots. It's up to you. On this the new President's first day in office, there is a change in the American people as their will, often thwarted, has now put a new team in power charged with being the point of real change. That has reverberated around the world encouraging millions and billions watching us here in the USA. If we let up trying to leave it to just one man, it puts that person at increased risk by making him an increased target (cut off the head & the rest will die) and the momentum will risk being lost defaulting us back to the old failed ways waiting in the wings to pounce on us. Your job and mine is to see that this momentum not only continues but increases as we via our increasing numbers pressure our media and leaders to engage truth and particularly space exploration truth. Our most immediate goal is to force the release of the real satellite imaging data hidden away in secrecy some where. It will contain all the truth we need for this moment in time.
Originally posted by Dracula23
reply to post by Enigma Publius
come on you dont know that. for all we know we are just as evolved us they were when they lived only 10000 years on their palent...