New Jersey UFO Likely a Hoax

New Jersey UFO Likely a Hoax

news.yahoo.com

It seems likely that a mysterious set of UFO lights that appeared over Phoenix, Arizona last year made an unexpected reappearance over New Jersey on Monday night.

Strange lights appeared over New Jersey's Morris County on the evening of Jan. 5, according to a local TV station's report. The bright red lights were first noticed in the night sky by an eleven-year-old girl, who pointed out three lights grouped together, and another pair some distance away. The lights moved silently and slowly, then disappeared one by one.

(visit the link for the full news article)

What do we have here? possible disinformation? A great explaination? let's have it what are your thoughts on this? is uncle Sam trying to cover his tracks or what.I believe in the Phoenix lights and even after reading this article I still do, Debunkers rejoice as this appears in MSM, claiming hoax. Well what do we have here folks?

news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Link to Jersey lights, broadcast on a local station wcbstv.com...

Was it a UFO or is there an explanation for it?Strange, red, blinking lights could be seen across Morris County on Monday night, and officials thought they had figured out what caused them.

Now, they're not so sure.

Between 8:30 and 9 p.m., the Hurley family in Whippany captured images of a bizarre object in the sky and contacted WCBSTV.com.

"It was unsettling for sure," said Cindy Hurley. "It was something you've never seen before, and a very strange pattern."

Eleven-year-old Kristin was the first to spot them, a group of three lights together, and two lights together, seen in the horizon through the trees. "I looked up outside. I was really scared and saw five red lights," she said.
First youtube vider is the New Jersey lights.

Second Youtube video is the Phoenix lights in April of 2008

[edit on 9-1-2009 by alyosha1981]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by alyosha1981]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by alyosha1981]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by alyosha1981]

reply to post by alyosha1981


There's simply not enough information to say either way but most will make a call based on their beliefs and what they want to be true.

To some it will be proof of a hoax, which it is not, and to others it will be proof that aliens exist and that the Phoenix lights of 2008 were a genuine event, which is still unproven.

Lines are always drawn in the sand with this stuff regardless of the facts.

IRM

I like how the witnesses of the mystery lights all have names but the
alleged hoaxer in Phoenix and the balloon-eyewitness are shrouded
and not named.

Also isn't this a different Phoenix case?! "The Phoenix Lights" was
a name adopted in 1997 to an unexplained case of lights in the sky.
I don't remember them being red either.

The one in reference is in 2008. Hoax or no hoax. I feel an attempt
at lessening the original "Phoenix Lights" importance and credibility.

Disinformation, unclear facts and no names assigned to those
who were supposedly first hand witnesses to the hoax.

Even from an objective view how can read this and conclude 100%,
that this was a hoax. You smell that?!

It's BS.





[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

Originally posted by cluckerspud
I like how the witnesses of the mystery lights all have names but the
alleged hoaxer in Phoenix and the balloon-eyewitness are shrouded
and not named.

Also isn't this a different Phoenix case?! "The Phoenix Lights" was
a name adopted in 1997 to an unexplained case of lights in the sky.
I don't remember them being red either.

The one in reference is in 2008. Hoax or no hoax. I feel an attempt
at lessening the original "Phoenix Lights" importance and credibility.

Disinformation, unclear facts and no names assigned to those
who were supposedly first hand witnesses to the hoax.

Even from an objective view how can read this and conclude 100%,
that this was a hoax. You smell that?!

It's BS.





[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

I added the videos and wanted to give this one a bump I don't know if people don't care about this one or what?

Originally posted by alyosha1981
Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

It's to keep us with in the boundaries of our elite thinkers.
A set parameter. Hear me out.

They don't want us to know what is out there, because I think
the existence to UFO's means they have to stop lying. It's hard
to stop the lie once it is so big. Also admitting to their existence
could prove realms of science unimaginable. Free energy and so
on.

Reasons for articles like this are to keep people who may believe in
anything off this rock is stupid, and it classifies you as a whacko.

Therefore we get the Science Channel that tells us how massive,
expansive, unpredictable and empty space is. No life, just plenty
of beautiful galaxies, stars, nebulas, blackholes, dark matter, super
novas, moons, gasses etc. But no life. That would be crazy, now sit
down, it must be a road flare.

I think any hoaxers should be sought out, brought to light and charged
with "Obstructing Science". Also tying up the 911 phone line and wasting
the time of any officers involved.

Notice how nothing will be done to find out who the hoaxer is.
But they will sure find out who is crazy and saw the lights.
They'll give you there full name, put em on TV and tell you
what town they live in.

Originally posted by cluckerspud

Originally posted by alyosha1981
Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

It's to keep us with in the boundaries of our elite thinkers.
A set parameter. Hear me out.

They don't want us to know what is out there, because I think
the existence to UFO's means they have to stop lying. It's hard
to stop the lie once it is so big. Also admitting to their existence
could prove realms of science unimaginable. Free energy and so
on.

Reasons for articles like this are to keep people who may believe in
anything off this rock is stupid, and it classifies you as a whacko.

Therefore we get the Science Channel that tells us how massive,
expansive, unpredictable and empty space is. No life, just plenty
of beautiful galaxies, stars, nebulas, blackholes, dark matter, super
novas, moons, gasses etc. But no life. That would be crazy, now sit
down, it must be a road flare.

I think any hoaxers should be sought out, brought to light and charged
with "Obstructing Science". Also tying up the 911 phone line and wasting
the time of any officers involved.

Notice how nothing will be done to find out who the hoaxer is.
But they will sure find out who is crazy and saw the lights.
They'll give you there full name, put em on TV and tell you
what town they live in.

I agree, but didn't UFO hunter's debunk the flair theory? I believe this is disinformation pure and simple

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I agree, but didn't UFO hunter's debunk the flair theory? I believe this is disinformation pure and simple

I also don't know about the flair theory being debunked.
I have mixed feelings with UFO Hunters. I was excited to
see the show at first, but was kind of let down.

I will certainly research in the next few days. If you get
anything or hear anything I look forward to hearing.

Back to disinformation...
Absolutely. Even if they claim it's not.

reply to post by cluckerspud


Well not to say I believe everything that the show says, they attempted to do an experiment on the flair theory and it had horible results, I'll try to find some youtube video of it if I can, but needless to say the flair theory IMO is garbage you can tell the fakes that use flairs because they have a faling residue and the Balloons that hold them up are swept away bu wind so they don't keep a perfect triangle formation.