posted on Jan, 11 2009 @ 11:35 AM
I for one, not attempting to play the Devil's Advocate here,
do agree with the logic behind this reasoning.
If banks and their directors can commit fraud, high crimes and misdemeanors, and get money,
ALL THE WHILE, in bed with the FED, Treasury (Paulson) and Foreign Investors, (keep in mind, the mindset now-a-days is to reward those thieves who get
away with the most),
As if awarding billions to allow continued wrongdoing is much more logical than using laws in place (such as RICO) to prosecute these blatant
mis-managers of our wealth, is the logical thing to do,
Then, it stands to reason that these other industries such as Porn,
who also are in bed together, should be awarded whatever they request.
In fact, it makes more sense to award bailouts to Porn providers than to banks because not only do they provide a service that is easier to understand
than all the legal terms of instruments of the money lenders,
but they give us full discosure of what they do with the money.
If the banks, FED and Treasury were to follow the example of how the Porn industry conducts business, we would probably not be in this mess to begin
with.
It is the snowball effect from the banking debocal that has harmed the porn industry anyways.
It is a true example of "trickle down" economics.
It just seems that what is trickling down in the porn world is metaphorically the equivelent of what is trickling down in the banking world.
In my opinion, of course.