NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed

Originally posted by Gonenuts
reply to post by esdad71

 

Prisonplanet....are you kidding? There is no debunking. None. Did any of you read the NIST report or just hit good ole' prison planet? Alex Jones....You are going to take the research of a talk show host over the scientists at NIST?

Right! That interview on Prisons Planet has not been proven a lie but NIST reports have been proven a lie. It is easy to bury your head in the sand when the truth hurts.

Sorry, I will take the word of NIST's man

Had you bother to do any real research in to NIST reports, you would not have made that statement. Before you go around spouting off “opinions” do some real research, then maybe people might take you more seriously.

I watched your video and it is comparing an interim report with a final report. So, there were assumptions in the interim and conclusions in the final.

They ruled out thermite but not nano-thermite? Should this even be an argument? So, after all the whining and complaining they rule out what was 'originally' stated was used and now it is something else since it was ruled out based on the reaction/direction.

So, this is nothing but a call for an investigation to drum up ratings for Mr Jones. They even mention that NIST admitted to near free fall speeds. Of course they did. If something other than gravity works against a falling object, it is not free fall speeds.

So, in conclusion nothing was debunked.

reply to post by esdad71

That is you opinion nothing more.

to drum up ratings for Mr Jones.

What are you talking about “ratings” for Mr Jones? Does Jones have his own TV show?

Alex Jones is a radio talk show host. That is his job. He is not a professor, or a scientist, or a scholar. He is a talk show host who makes money off of conspiracy DVD's and good ratings.

Sorry, but it is not opinion that states the NIST report as not debunked, it is just fact. He creates fear and then sells you a DVD.

posted by esdad71
Alex Jones is a radio talk show host. That is his job. He is not a professor, or a scientist, or a scholar. He is a talk show host who makes money off of conspiracy DVD's and good ratings.

Sorry, but it is not opinion that states the NIST report as not debunked, it is just fact. He creates fear and then sells you a DVD.

It was not Alex Jones who proved NIST a pack of liars; it was Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. You twist everything like a disinfo agent. Your opinion is worthless in this matter.

9/11 Truth responds to NIST with HARD FACTS & Evidence!

Please copy and re-post! Spread this like virus!
Make sure to use different search tags too!

NIST process for submitting comments: wtc.nist.gov...

NIST's public affairs "Fact" sheet:
www.nist.gov...

AE911Truth's letter in response to NIST:
wtc.nist.gov...

Top Ten Connections between NIST and nano-thermites:
www.journalof911studies.com...

NIST's Interim Report on WTC 7: wtc.nist.gov...

Please also look up:
NCSTAR1-9A (WTC7 summary Report)
NCSTAR1-9 (parts 1 and 2 'detailed' analysis)

www.ae911truth.org...

2009 is the DISCLOSURE YEAR!

It was on Alex Jones website and he is quite involved with the 9/11 truth movement. Who do you think helped to produce Loose Change and all of the other videos out there fueling the conspiracy theorists.

Also, the list of experts for AE911 is some pretty funny reading, especailly the guys who says something smells fishy...

[edit on 19-1-2009 by esdad71]

posted by esdad71

Also, the list of experts for AE911 is some pretty funny reading, especailly the guys who says something smells fishy...

Really? The membership caused you to laugh? Of course your own biased opinion would be of more value to you, wouldn't it?

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth membership

No, it made me laugh. Please take a look at the experts that they are using. You need a non biased look at what happened.

NIST actually accepted the challenge if you will call it that to explore if anything other than a collapse based on the structure, fires and damage could have been the precursor to the WTC 7 falling. You do not see that in ANY of the truther movement articles.

They are comparing, in this video, an interim report that was changed. Loose Change 2 included quite a few changes also and it comes from the same people who are trying to take apart the final NIST report. What is good for one is not good for another?