It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[At one assassination research conference in Chicago, I was ordered to be silent or be removed, when I confronted Oliver Stone's chief researcher for the movie "JFK" with a question Is it not true that the French Rothschilds, linked to the Kennedy Family, principally financed the 42 million dollars for "JFK", and ran it primarily in their U.S. movie houses, to get revenge on Kennedy Family enemies? ]
A few hours later Oliver Stone himself showed up at the meeting, and considering me apparently as some poor wretch in a wheelchair, condescended to allow me to tape a short segment with him on a less direct question and answer.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
It's interesting to think of elites financing certain movies to fight proxy propaganda wars with each other.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
I have to admit I'm not sure how an all seeing eye logo makes a movie disinformation. I guess that's why you are asking Mr. Marrs' opinion, not mine. I think obvious propaganda movies such as Black Hawk Down are much better examples.
Originally posted by Jim Marrs
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
Howdy Doomsday 2029,
When I first learned that director Oliver Stone was planning to make a movie on 9/11 (which turned out to be World Trade Center), I sent him a copy of my book The Terror Conspiracy and urged him to consider the conspiracy aspects of that event. He politely replied that he had not looked into the subject of conspiracy and was merely wanting to honor the courage of the first responders. However, you may have noticed that in this film, as the tower falls on the firemen, one can hear multiple explosions, a decidedly odd circumstance for a building simply collapsing. Perhaps this was his subtle way of trying to atone for a lack of curiosity concerning the many questions and contradictions of 9/11? I cannot comment on W as I have not had the opportunity to see it. But just consider that Mr. Stone has been busted for drugs on at least two occasions which, under California's "Three Strikes" policy, could make him liable for a long term in prison. This might explain his reluctance to cause the Establishment any new problems.
Jim Marrs
Then there are some dialogues/passages that I thought were rather salient and deserved extra addressing:
“Jerry: They’ll stick me in the same place as Oswald, just another lunatic acting alone.
Alice: Oswald killed the President, is that what you’re planning to do Jerry?
Jerry: No, on the contrary.”
This can be counted as a confirmation to the idea that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing John F Kennedy, which is ironically and remarkably quite unlike what real life ‘conspiracy theorists’ believe by and large.
“Jerry: The Oliver Stone-Bush Connection. If anyone who has the information he’s got and had a national podium to shout it from, they actually let him do it? No it’s quite clear that he is a disinformation junkie for them….The fact that he’s still alive says it all. He probably should be dead but he’s not.”
Originally posted by Jim Marrs
But just consider that Mr. Stone has been busted for drugs on at least two occasions which, under California's "Three Strikes" policy, could make him liable for a long term in prison. This might explain his reluctance to cause the Establishment any new problems.
Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
I wasn't aware that Mr. Stone had two strikes working against him. That's not a bad theory, but in my opinion it doesn't serve as an excuse to spread the mass amounts propoganda that he did in the movie W.
Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
It's all about Hollywood.
I've dicovered this, and I hope others will too.