It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World
Trade Center Towers on 9/11.
Dr. Quintiere made his plea during his presentation, “Questions
on the WTC Investigations” at the 2007 World Fire Safety
Conference. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he
said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records
that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like
to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both
structurally and from a fire point of view.”
“I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is
questionable,” explained Dr. Quintiere. “Let's look at real
alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the
World Trade Towers
3. Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?