The government has already had 'disclosure'

This is a very simple theory and I'm sure it must have been posted at one point or another, but I was urged to post this when I read the thread on the Canadian Ex-Prime Minister of Defense saying that the United States knows alot about ET's and has some of their technologie.
Now my theory is that the government is not lying when they say "UFOs don't exist". Because, if they know as much as some people say they do, then in their eyes there is no such thing as an Unidentified Flying Object. So when asked the question "Are UFO's real?" the real response they give is "No, because we know exactly what they are."

I appologize if this is nothing breaking.

[edit on 19-12-2008 by darkxhampster]

reply to post by darkxhampster


So you are suggesting that we should just change the terminology that we use when questioning the gov. about UFOS?

We could ask the if they have advanced technologies from races from other worlds instead?

Sounds like a good idea.

reply to post by dalan.


more or less.
but i dont think you would get far with that question due to classification
I'm focusing more on the point that this may be one other bit of proof that the government is hiding information on extraterrestrials. And the fact that it means they arent lying, they've just found a loophole.

This was mostly brought up because I can't think of a MSM incident where anyone asked somebody about anything other than UFO's.

Lets just keep chipping away at it

what do you think he really means by open the books?

Blast Firefox. I forgot to relog before i posted last. I accidentally replied anonymously.

in reply to Dalan
I think it would be a good idea to change terminology of questions but I dont think it would get you far.
I put more of my focus on the fact that this could be another bit of information proving that the government does know whats out there. And perhaps they have told us what they know indirectly. They haven't lied, they've just found a loophole.

And in reply to Slayer69
I just watched that video after I posted this topic.
I think people in the clinton administration were told something about ET's seeing as Bill Clinton and his Chief of Staff were openly interested in UFO's. They also both seemed to want disclosure and talked like they knew that there was something that they couldnt talk about.
his quote from the video "We should do this because it's the law" basically says he wants to say what he knows and is upset that he is forbidden to.


[edit for reply]

[edit on 19-12-2008 by darkxhampster]

Next time ask "do alien spacecrafts exist"? That wont be so vague.

IMHO.

Irrespective of how the 'government' may interpret the meaning or definition of what constitutes a 'UFO', its policy is based on 'denying' this phenomenon is anything more than swamp gas or chineese lanterns etc etc Its a safe and well tried method of keeping control.

Its a policy that has so far stood the test of time even in the face of 'strong' evidence and whistle-blowers within its ranks.

Its a Pandora's Box in the true sense of the word, one that cannot be closed once opened. The ramifications of even opening this box just a little to the public would cause an uncontrollable avalanche of pressure to bear on the government that it would quickly find itself burdened even more to revealing even more of its hard earned secrets.

Globally, the effect of such 'limited' official disclosure would call into question mankind's whole history, weather or not it was influenced in some way from outside sources, religion's would be called into question and looked in a different light, [example] could those references relating to 'beings' coming down from the skies be something other than Angels etc.

The public outcry for answers would dominate everything, worldwide.

Thereafter, each new sighting of a 'UFO', even if caused by natural atmospheric conditions or simply a case of mistaken identity, would install fear and panic in those we call sheeple, since they will be the least prepared to deal with these things flying around above them with no apparent restrictions.

I could go on and on here but you get the point i hope.

Originally posted by Freelancer
IMHO.

Irrespective of how the 'government' may interpret the meaning or definition of what constitutes a 'UFO', its policy is based on 'denying' this phenomenon is anything more than swamp gas or chineese lanterns etc etc Its a safe and well tried method of keeping control.

Its a policy that has so far stood the test of time even in the face of 'strong' evidence and whistle-blowers within its ranks.

Its a Pandora's Box in the true sense of the word, one that cannot be closed once opened. The ramifications of even opening this box just a little to the public would cause an uncontrollable avalanche of pressure to bear on the government that it would quickly find itself burdened even more to revealing even more of its hard earned secrets.

Globally, the effect of such 'limited' official disclosure would call into question mankind's whole history, weather or not it was influenced in some way from outside sources, religion's would be called into question and looked in a different light, [example] could those references relating to 'beings' coming down from the skies be something other than Angels etc.

The public outcry for answers would dominate everything, worldwide.

Thereafter, each new sighting of a 'UFO', even if caused by natural atmospheric conditions or simply a case of mistaken identity, would install fear and panic in those we call sheeple, since they will be the least prepared to deal with these things flying around above them with no apparent restrictions.

I could go on and on here but you get the point i hope.

Well done Freelancer I could not presented that better myself.

I had big hopes for Dr S Greer but something or somone got to him then he just went right off the rails with outlandish claims and BS.

It got to the point when I thought Greer was going to turn into some cult Guru like GFL.

Which is better, continue the false premise of God and Angels, or tell the truth and put humanity back on track where it should have been for centuries?

Obviously, doing the same thing isnt working. IMO, its time for the real change to occur.

If that means changing the landscape of religion, perhaps that will cease all this my God is bigger than your God BS and tribal warfare over faiths and differences.

I think the world needs a different road to be traveling on, a fresh new road, not the worn out, pothole saturated one we are on now.

Government needs to fully come clean and bring forth these technologies for the betterment and long term survival of humanity. All this garbage over resources that are limited, yet they hold the keys to unexaustable resources is not in the best interests of humanity's survival.

Sure drill for more antiquated drug oil and re-feed the addiction for another 100 years, but when that 100 years are over, and the new finds are tapped, humanity will be right were it started all over again, and nothing will be really solved. More wars, more conflict over depletable resources and all for what...a buck? Is humanity's future and survial for the long term worth less than making a buck?

What good will all that profit be when there is no one around to spend it or make it?

Self destructive methods never are constructive. And right now, we are on a course of destroying ourselves and it will only get worse and then it will be too late to save this world.





Cheers!!!!

reply to post by RFBurns




You are of course right in that we should be told the real 'truth' and I am 100% behind this very ideal. However, the damage done to the overall consciousness of mankind will take a number of generations to undo before we can even think about getting back on track.

The shackles of ignorance has been carefully programmed into our history and our self-being that at the present time, the majority of mankind would not be able to cope with this new found enlightenment. I would go so far and say it would cause us more harm than good right now.