It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by n0b0DY
I thought "Great, I love working for churches."
I was not expecting what was in store for me.
Pornography, Blasphemy, Hypocrasy, Sexual Perversions,
Drinking, Cursing, Betraying, the list goes on.
To this day I think I was the only Christian on staff.
It was a really, really, reaallly, tough place.
My biblical views were laughed at and I was always spat on by the head guys because I refused to follow their behaviour.
But God got me out.
Originally posted by n0b0DY
Now I also know of christian scientists who went into the same enviorment in their field. I cant even start to describe what they went through.
Originally posted by babloyi
Atheists claiming that belief in God is unscientific and thus theists are unscientific and cannot be scientists,
Originally posted by babloyi
and then the theists actually responding in terms of attacking science (science is evil, science is against God, etc)!
Originally posted by babloyi
It is very disappointing, especially since such a weird debate shouldn't even pop up! There is no logical reason that there should be any line drawn between science and religion. In fact, if you ask me, being a theist would actually be a pretty good basis for being a scientist, in that a person would want to understand and experience this incredible world we live in.
Originally posted by babloyi
For me, my beliefs are strong enough, and I am comfortable enough in them that I don't mind learning about new things, and on the tiny chance that they may be wrong, it is better for me to know and correct myself than to hide in the darkness.
Originally posted by babloyi
Take evolution for example: While there are many theists who accept evolution as a viable theory, anti-theists seem to have taken it up as there banner, so some theists respond by attacking it, and attempting at every step to make it out to be false. It may be true, and may be false, or part of it may be true. But by taking it up in such a ridiculous way, you are actually impeding the path of science! Now anti-theists will not consider evidence that shows that evolution may be false, because they need to prove there viewpoint right, and some theists will not consider evidence for evolution, because they need to prove their viewpoint right. The result: Both science, as well as well as the integrity of theistic beliefs suffer.
Originally posted by babloyi
SCIENCE DOES NOT DISPROVE GOD, NOR DOES GOD DISPROVE SCIENCE.
Originally posted by babloyi
I hope this discussion goes well, and doesn't descend into lists of scientists and their beliefs, and what this or that great scientist thinks about belief or non-belief, or arguments about what the actual beliefs of a certain scientist were....all that is a pretty unscientific way of looking at things
Originally posted by holywar
"Science and religion [are] no longer seen as incompatible."— The Daily Telegraph, London, May 26, 1999.
RECONCILING Science and Religion
Has science really seized the moral high ground? The answer is no. Postgate himself admits that "scientific communities have their share of jealousy, greed, prejudice and envy." He adds that "a few scientists have shown themselves capable of murder in the name of research, as happened in Nazi Germany and Japanese prison camps." And when National Geographic assigned an investigative reporter to find out how a fossil hoax ended up in its pages, the reporter spoke of "a tale of misguided secrecy and misplaced confidence, of rampant egos clashing, self-aggrandizement, wishful thinking, naive assumptions, human error, stubbornness, manipulation, backbiting, lying, [and] corruption."
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
I know Scientists that have been fired for heir beliefs when it didn't interfere with their job.
Originally posted by saint4God
Do tell! At work I'm aloud to wear my cross. In college, I took more heat from honors Biology and any other venue but can share my testament after yours.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
All the Fathers of Science and MOST of the Great ones that are recognized today for their fields WERE CREATIONISTS!
I think both sides can go overboard at times. I know Scientists that have been fired for heir beliefs when it didn't interfere with their job. but there is also many evolutionists out there skewing the actual evidence to lead people to believe heir point of view.
Science and Faith can go hand in hand as many great ones had no problem with it...
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
Search the book titled Earth's tiny Mysteries... It is about Polonium Halos in granite, written by a well respected Scientist.
I tell you this so you find your own info and not what I lead you too. After you get the books author, read his story and Biography and when and why he was fired... I am not saying ALL scientists are this way, I am sure there are many good on both sides that don't let their preconceived notions lead them to their actions or findings. But it does happen, watch the movie Expelled with Ben Stein just released he has several that were fired for being Creationists.
Originally posted by Bombeni
Saint4God: Do you have a suggestion or idea regarding the following question poised by an atheist?
He quotes Jesus's scripture where He refers to the birds of the air, how they neither sow nor reap yet their Heavenly Father takes care of them. He goes on to say 'aren't you worth more than these creatures?'
My atheist friend wants to know why God would be sure to provide for birds of the air, which He refers to be less worthy than humans, while allowing babies around the world to starve and suffer with all manner of disease. He quips that SOME people must actually be lower than the fowl of the air, in God's eyes.
I don't know how to answer this, and it has come up before from other people. I know that some parts of the Bible are mysteries, and some of God's way are mysteries. Do we just need to be satisfied that this is one of those mysteries, and tell our detractors that? You may not have the answer and I don't mean to put you on the spot; perhaps someone else may even have some suggestions.