Interesting Photo on the MUFON Site

Hi All,

Just wondering what you guys make of this report on the MUFON Site. The photo looks to be original complete with EXIF Data.
www.mufoncms.com...

Its a bright white object.

Regards

S.

[edit on 26-11-2008 by steamin]

Nobody interested in commenting?

ok, well honestly it looks like a white spot in the sky?

doesn't look like much to me.

very nice picture indeed. im no tech savy person so i cant jump on a cgi bandwagon, although i wouldnt even if i could. looks like a ufo to me.

if the original CGI artist is reading..you proved nothing.

if the original photographer is reading, your not alone.

It's definitely mmm... Unidentifiable.

It could be anything from a bird to a reflective object(kite, balloon, plane).
I'm surprised Mufon would even put up such an ambiguous picture. I am really starting to question the motives of the organization known as Mufon.

Cool picture.

That spectacular white is often how chem trail planes appear. So bright white and glared that even the naked eye sees nothing more than a white blur. Great for hiding the identity of the craft.

Looks like a helicopter with a load suspended below it. At least that's what it looks like to me.

it IS a dammaged negitive!

it's a hoax.

reply to post by Incarnated


Maybe you could enlighten us as to how you reach that conclusion, when you can't spell damaged or negative, and speak about negatives in a digital image.

This ought to be good.

Some kind of bright thing in the sky, apparently.

What interests me more, however, are the dozen or so little "mosquitos" flying around in the rest of the photo. Little blackish dots with blurry wings. Are they related? Are they birds?

So many questions. And only a photo.

For whatever it is worth:






Paper Airplane? Im guessing Seagull. *shrug*


[edit on 11/26/2008 by greeneyedleo]

Congrats, that is a very interesting seagull. There are about 30 of them just like it on MUFON.

reply to post by jritzmann


It is a digital image now, but I feel its a safe assumption by the seaper tones of the clouds and also chemical scaring in closer up images that these are digital scans of print type photographs. It looks to me that these prints come from a poorly run 1hr prints place.

Originally posted by Incarnated
reply to post by jritzmann

 

It is a digital image now, but I feel its a safe assumption by the seaper tones of the clouds and also chemical scaring in closer up images that these are digital scans of print type photographs. It looks to me that these prints come from a poorly run 1hr prints place.

Really?

Here's the full data:

EXIF — this group of metadata is encoded in 13,960 bytes (13.6k)

Aperture Value 9.1
Color Space sRGB
Components Configuration YCbCr
Compression JPEG (old-style)
Create Date 2008:09:06 13:07:40
2 months, 20 days, 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
Custom Rendered Normal
Date/Time Original 2008:09:06 13:07:40
2 months, 20 days, 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
Exif Image Size 4,272 × 2,848
Exif Version 0221
Exposure Compensation 0
Exposure Mode Auto
Exposure Program Program AE
Exposure Time 1/640
F Number 9.0
Flash Off
Flashpix Version 0100
Focal Length 300.0 mm
Focal Plane X Resolution 4,865.603645 pixels/inch
Focal Plane Y Resolution 4,876.712329 pixels/inch
ISO 200
Interoperability Index R98 - DCF basic file (sRGB)
Interoperability Version 0100
Make Canon
Metering Mode Multi-segment
Camera Model Name Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi
Modify Date 2008:09:06 13:07:40
2 months, 20 days, 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Resolution 72 pixels/inch
Scene Capture Type Standard
Shutter Speed Value 1/664
Sub Sec Time 03
Sub Sec Time Digitized 03
Sub Sec Time Original 03
Thumbnail Length 4,310
User Comment

White Balance Auto
Y Cb Cr Positioning Co-sited

[edit on 11/26/2008 by greeneyedleo]

Here's what I'm talking about. What's all this other junk?

reply to post by Incarnated


nope. you couldn't be more wrong. the whole thing was a drawing done in crayon.

Originally posted by Nohup
Here's what I'm talking about. What's all this other junk?

Looks like either crap (er dirt) on the lense or bugs in the air. I thought my monitor was dirty at first

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Is it just possible that these are 'Lunar Orbs' with their white triangular 'mother Ship'?
The white object does look rather like a triangular craft as seen from the rear.

Regards,

Horsegiver.

I'm not a debunker, I've seen one definite UFO and another possible one myself, but I'm going with greeneyedleo on this one - it looks like a seagull that caught the sun to me too. The other specks are probably more seagulls. It would help if we had a description of how the object was moving.

Originally posted by horsegiver
reply to post by greeneyedleo

 

Is it just possible that these are 'Lunar Orbs' with their white triangular 'mother Ship'?
The white object does look rather like a triangular craft as seen from the rear.

Regards,

Horsegiver.

Um. Sure, anything is possible, but I doubt it.

Here is a picture of Seagulls in various shapes as they fly.


So it is more likely a bird in flight.

The dots, more likely dirt or bugs:

flickr.com...