It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
JThomas is only showing the relevance of the date stamp in this video. We know it means nothing.
Perhaps you have something to add yourself. Instead of you calling people trolls, could you share your opinion as to why?
Now, if this was a fake video produced by the government, why would they leave such an obvious detail in it?
Oh, and while they are making a fake video (and taking three years to do so) why not doctor in an airplane, shutting up the no-planers.
Originally posted by Griff
You don't think it's relevant in the least? OK.
Hypothetical: I somehow infiltrate the pentagon and steal something on 9/1/2001 at 9:30:00.
I get away and they don't know who I am. It isn't discovered until 9/7/2001. But the clock I broke in one of the rooms tells them it happened on 9/1/2001 at 9:30:00.
They go to the security tapes for the time it happened. NOT the tapes showing 32 hours later (9/2/2001 @ 17:30:00) as I would have been long gone then.
We have 2 choices here.
1. It's a fake.
2. The security of the pentagon is a joke.
Take your pick.
Look up the meaning of internet troll. It should have in parenthesis (jthomas). That is why. Hell, Ultima was a troll but at least he backed some of his stuff up. I have yet to see the same from certain persons that have remained here while Ultima was banned. Even throatyogurt backed his stuff up more and was far less of a troll but got banned.
A nice picture of a 757 wouldn't really sit well as it was suppossed to be doing 500 MPH. I have never claimed that we would see it on this particular video. But, to think all the other cameras in the vicinity were all set to capture frames when this camera was is silly.
So. You tell me. Is the security at the pentagon top notch or is it shoddy? If it's shoddy, why hasn't anyone been fired?
posted by Griff
You don't think it's relevant in the least? OK.
posted by CameronFox
No Griff, I really don't. How could they, while doctoring a video "miss" something so blatantly obvious? This faked video per some truthers, was almost three years in the making. I think the date/time stamp does more to confirm the validity of the video.
I see your point, yet when replaying tape for that area, it would be obvious that the time/date is off. The staff looking at the tapes would be able to see the error.