9 underwater nuclear explosions, what for??

A week ago there were 9 'quakes' reported in the Arctic ocean, all occurring at a depth of 10km's, and all without subsequent aftershocks.

The Arctic isn't prone to earthquakes, so what's going on?
In preparation for this article, my main objective was to plot the coordinates onto Google Earth to see if there was any correlation between the 9 'quakes.'

The list of 'quakes' provided by;

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Is shown here;

MAG 5.7 DATE 2008/11/17 TIME 12:55:23 LAT 79.656 LON -116.072 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 4.7 DATE 2008/11/17 TIME 13:16:52 LAT 79.512 LON -115.585 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 5.1 DATE 2008/11/17 TIME 13:40:11 LAT 79.698 LON -115.453 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 4.7 DATE 2008/11/17 TIME 17:17:05 LAT 79.697 LON -115.448 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 5.4 DATE 2008/11/18 TIME 03:59:49 LAT 79.692 LON -115.317 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 5.1 DATE 2008/11/18 TIME 04:10:36 LAT 79.763 LON -115.704 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 5.3 DATE 2008/11/18 TIME 04:52:52 LAT 79.747 LON -115.310 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 4.8 DATE 2008/11/18 TIME 05:37:28 LAT 79.733 LON -114.958 DEPTH 10.0

MAG 4.7 DATE 2008/11/18 TIME 07:05:13 LAT 79.776 LON -114.689 DEPTH 10.0

www.rumormillnews.com...
www.rumormillnews.com...

Already a thread here about this very thing.

I didn't respond to the first thread as it is obviously not true.

Underground nukes, not a problem. Drilling to 6.5 miles on solid land, somewhat of a problem. Doing it in water, impossible with current technology.

But you know, many smart people within this site know this already, but they still feed the trolls.

Couldn't the subsequent quakes actually be the aftershocks?

I missed this one, going to go over and read the other thread.

are they blowing up ancient cities found underwater?

Existing thread here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion.
Thank you







-thread closed-



for future reference:
Search ATS